Leader cultural intelligence and organizational performance

Figures & data

Figure 1. Organizational structure dimensions and the evaluation criteria.

Source: own compilation based on literature.

Figure 2. Conceptual model of the study.

Table 1. Demographic features of the study sample

Demographic Characteristics		Frequency	Percentage
Gender	Male	24	41.4%
	Female	34	58.6%
Total		58	100%
Experience	0–5	13	23%
	5–10	17	29%
	Over 10	28	48%
Total		58	100%
Academic Qualifications	Diploma	2	3%
	Associated Degree	7	12%
	Bachelor’s Degree	40	69%
	Master’s Degree	8	14%
	Ph.D.	1	2%
Total		58	100%

Table 2. Validity and Reliability of the variables

Variables	KMO	AVE	Cronbach’s alpha	CR
Cultural Intelligence	0.62	0.722	0.92	0.933
Organizational Performance	0.91	0.789	0.87	0.922
Organizational Structure	0.83	0.672	0.84	0.918

Figure 3. The test of the proposed model of the study; R-squares and Path Coefficients.

Figure 4. The conceptual model of the study and the results of |t-value| test.

Table 3. The loading factors of observed variables

Observable Variables	Leader CQ	Enablers	Results	Organizational Structure
Cognitive	0.730
Metacognitive -	0.906
Motivational	0.872
Behavioral	0.867
Leadership		0.891
Strategy		0.826
Partnerships and resources		0.893
Processes, Products, and services		0.847
People		0.882
Customer Results			0.836
People Results			0.679
Business Results			0.756
Society Results			0.795
Formalization				0.843
Complexity				0.730
Centralization				0.532

** All the loading factors are significant at the 99% confidence level.

Table 4. The results of hypotheses testing

Hypotheses	Path Coefficient (β)	T-value	R^2	Result
Cultural Intelligence → Performance enablers	0.349**	3.423	0.722	Confirmed
Cultural Intelligence → Organizational Structure	0.431**	5.322	0.491	Confirmed
Organizational Structure → Performance enablers	0.232**	3.126	0.722	Confirmed
Performance enablers → Performance Results	0.676**	18.055	0.855	Confirmed

** the correspond path coefficient is significant at 99% confidence level