Organizational justice and employee in-role performance nexus: a dual theory perspective

Figures & data

Figure 1. Research framework.

Table 1. Properties of measurement model

Dimensions	Items	Factors loadings	Cronbach’s alpha	Composite Reliability	AVE
Organizational justice	DDJ1	0.749		0.804	0.510
	DJ2	0.629	0.674
	DJ4	0.741
	IJ1	0.750
	IJ2	0.827
	IJ4	0.763
	PJ3	0.891
	PJ5	0.708
	PJ7	0.616
Organizational embeddedness	OE1	0.746	0.817	0.872	0.576
	OE2	0.755
	OE3	0.819
	OE4	0.747
	OE7	0.725
Employees Advocacy	EA1	0.703		0.849	0.531
	EA2	0.803
	EA3	0.755	0.779
	EA5	0.733
	EA6	0.639
In-role performance	IR1	0.796		0.798	0.502
	IR2	0.745	0.657
	IR3	0.721
	IR4	0.547

Source: SmartPLS results

Table 2. Discriminant validity

Variable	EA	OE	IR	OJ
EA	0.729
OE	0.429	0.759
IR	0.333	0.565	0.708
OJ	0.543	0.246	0.240	0.714

*Bold number on the diagonal represents the square-root of AVE. whereas the values outside the diagonal represents the inter-construct correlations; whereas, EA stands for employees’ advocacy, OE shows organizational embeddedness, IR is in-role performance and OJ is organizational justice.

Table 3. Hypotheses testing

	Original Sample (O)	Sample Mean (M)	t-statistics	p-value
OJ-> IR	0.246	0.245	4.648	0.000
DJ->OE	0.020	0.020	2.698	0.007
PJ->OE	0.240	0.239	12.002	0.000
IJ->OE	0.889	0.887	6.675	0.000
OJ->OE->IR	0.542	0.541	11.977	0.000
Mod.EA b/wOE-IR->IR	0.104	0.100	2.302	0.022

Source: SmartPLS algorithm with boot strapping