Autonomy and feedback on innovative work behavior: The role of resilience as a mediating factor in Indonesian Islamic banks

Figures & data

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework.

Table 1. Demographics of Respondents

Characteristic	Frequently	%
Gender
Male	150	58
Female	108	42
Age Group
Less than 30	18	7
30 to 40	124	Most
41 to 50	83	32
Above 50	34	13
Qualification
Undergraduate	232	90
Masters	23	9
PhD	3	1
Experience
Less than 5	85	33
6 to 10	39	15
Above 10	134	52

N = 258

Table 2. Validity and Reliability

Factors	Item Code	Loading	Alpha /CR	AVE
Autonomy	Au1	0.73	0.907/ 0.923	0.572
	Au2	0.75
	Au3	0.69
	Au4	0.78
	Au5	0.78
	Au6	0.79
	Au7	0.77
	Au8	0.72
	Au9	0.80
Feedback	Fb1	0.70	0.752 /0.842	0.571
	Fb2	0.81
	Fb3	0.73
	Fb4	0.78
Resilience	Re1	0.70	0.882/ 0.905	0.517
	Re2	0.68
	Re3	0.77
	Re4	0.74
	Re5	0.76
	Re6	0.74
	Re7	0.68
	Re8	0.60
	Re9	0.78
Innovative Work Behavior	iwb1	0.63	0.928/ 0.940	0.638
	iwb2	0.78
	iwb3	0.77
	iwb4	0.81
	iwb5	0.86
	iwb6	0.85
	iwb7	0.81
	iwb8	0.83
	iwb9	0.83

SRMR (0.073) < 0.08

Table 3. Discriminant Validity

Factors	1	2	3	4
1. AU	0.756
2. FB	0.607	0.756
3. IWB	0.526	0.469	0.799
4. RES	0.544	0.621	0.678	0.719

AU: Autonomy; FB: Feedback; RE: resilience; IWB: Innovative work behavior

Table 4. Path Coefficients

Path →	Β ± St. Dev	t-values	p- values
Autonomy → Innovative Work Behavior	0.234 ± 0.057	4.074	0.001
Autonomy → Resilience	0.267 ± 0.059	4.547	0.001
Feedback → Innovative Work Behavior	−0.026 ± 0.064	0.407	0.684
Feedback → Resilience	0.459 ± 0.056	8.210	0.001
Resilience → Innovative Work Behavior	0.567 ± 0.061	9.338	0.001

Table 5. Effect Size

F 2	IWB	Resilience
Autonomy	0.063	0.08
Feedback	0.001	0.235
Resilience	0.362
R 2	R Square	R Square Adjusted
Innovative Work Behavior	0.495	0.489
Resilience	0.432	0.427
Q2	SSO	SSE	Q^2 (=1-SSE/SSO)
Innovative Work Behavior	2322	1598.66	0.312
Resilience	2322	1820.746	0.216