If you care I care: role of Green Human Resource Management in employees green behaviors

Figures & data

Figure 1. Proposed model.

Table 1. Respondents information

Variables		Frequency	Percentage
Gender	Male	213	59.3
	Female	146	40.7
Age (in years)	<30	94	26.2
	30–40	185	51.5
	41–50	70	19.5
	>50	10	2.8
Education	Bachelor	164	45.7
	Masters	171	47.6
	Other	24	6.7
Experience (in years)	<3	51	14.2
	3–6	144	40.1
	7–10	83	23.1
	>10	81	22.6

Table 2. Reliability and validity assessment

Variables	Factor Loadings	CA	CR	AVE
Green Human Resource Management	.647–.832	.892	.895	.589
Green Employee Empowerment	.759–.891	.955	.952	.687
Individual Green Value	.821–.874	.876	.879	.707
Green Knowledge Sharing	.635–.800	.857	.861	.509

Note: CR=Composite Reliability, AVE= Average Variance Extracted, CA=Cronbach’s Alpha.

Table 3. Means, standard deviations and correlations

	Mean	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1.Gender	1.59	.49	1
2.Age	1.99	.76	−.103	1
3.Education	2.41	.61	−.076	.022	1
4.Experience	2.54	.99	−.001	.045	−.011	1
5.GHRM	3.85	.91	−.058	.014	.018	.009	.767
6.GEE	3.87	1.06	−.042	.027	−.084	.097	.298**	.829
7.IGV	3.97	.93	−.027	−.011	.141**	−.001	.193**	.012	.841
8.GKS	3.91	.87	−.078	−.006	−.053	.062	.532**	.518**	.183**	.714

Note: *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). The bold values are the square root of AVE.

Table 4. Mediation effect

Outcome: Green Knowledge Sharing	β	SE	t	p
Constant	1.960	.169	11.601	.000
Green Human Resource Management	.506	.043	11.861	.000
Outcome: Green Employee Empowerment	β	SE	t	p
Constant	2.537	.233	10.888	.000
Green Human Resource Management	.347	.059	5.896	.000
Outcome: Green Knowledge Sharing	β	SE	t	p
Constant	1.141	.175	6.527	.000
Green Employee Empowerment	.323	.034	9.376	.000
Green Human Resource Management	.394	.041	9.832	.000
	β	SE	LL95%CI	UL95%CI
Indirect Effect	.112	.027	.0654	.1708
	β	SE	Z
Normal Theory Test	.112	.023	4.971

Bootstrap sample = 5000, ULCI=Upper Limit Confidence Interval, LLCI=Lower Limit Confidence Interval.

Figure 2. Moderation effect of IGV between the relationship of GEE and GKS.

Table 5. Moderation effect

Outcome: Green Knowledge Sharing	β	SE	t	p
Constant	3.909	.039	101.424	.000
Green Employee Empowerment	.404	.046	8.872	.000
Individual Green Value	.177	.054	3.287	.001
Green Employee Empowerment x Individual Green Value	.107	.053	2.031	.043

Note: Bootstrap sample = 5000

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.