The honorific system in oral texts of historical site guardians in Madiun (Indonesia): a pragmasociostylistic perspective

Figures & data

Table 1. Characteristics of the informants.

No	Code	Gender	Age	Site	Job desk	Experience as a guardian site (years)	Number of observations
1	S1	M	61	Situs Ngurawan Dolopo	Site Caretaker	39	4
2	S2	M	59	Situs Mangirejo	Site Caretaker	31	7
3	S3	F	60	Candi Wonorejo	Temple guard	35	5
4	S4	M	52	Situs Alas Ketangga	Dolopo	29	3
5	S5	M	54	Museum Sasana Wiratama	Museum guard	36	6
6	S6	F	48	Masjid Kuna Kuncen	Grave caretaker	24	9
7	S7	M	50	Prasasti Bibrik Klagenserut	Site Caretaker	35	6
8	S8	M	53	Situs Nglambangan	Site Caretaker	38	6
9	S9	M	59	Situs Masjid Kuna Taman	Grave caretaker	35	5
10	S10	M	52	Museum Kresek	Museum guard	26	5
	Total/average	M = 8 F = 2	48–61	Masjid = 2 Museum = 2 Prasasti = 6	Guard = 3 Caretaker = 7	26–39	56

Figure 1. The map location of the Madiun Regency.

Table 2. Usage of honorary title.

Gender	Honorary title	Usage examples
Male	Panembahan	Panembahan Senopati
	Pangeran	Pangeran Timoer
	Ki	Ki Ageng Pemanahan; Ki Rangga Djumena; Ki Lawu Maospati
	Raden	Raden Patah
	Sultan	Sultan Trenggono
	Senopati	Senopati Sutawijaya
	Panji	Panji Klanthung
	Sunan	Sunan Giri
	Kyai	Kyai Pleret
	Begawan	Begawan Abiyasa
	Mpu	Mpu Sura
Female	Raden Ayu Retno	Raden Ayu Retno Djumilah
	Dewi	Dewi Sekartaji