1,120
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An evaluation of glutathione transferase associated with Dichlorvos degradation in African palm weevil (Rynchophorus phoenicis) larva

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1286764 | Received 22 Aug 2016, Accepted 22 Jan 2017, Published online: 14 Feb 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Glutathione peroxidase activity of fat body (FB), gut (GT), and head (H) tissues of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva treated with varied concentration of DDVP solution.

Notes: Each value is the mean of five repetitions ± SD. Significant difference in the treated groups from their corresponding control was indicated by alphabets (a-f) at p < 0.05.
Key: Control-larva treated with acetone in normal saline; D0.20-larva treated with 0.20 µg g−1 (w/v) DDVP; D0.30-larva treated with 0.30 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.40-larva treated with 0.40 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.50-larva treated with 0.50 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.60-larva treated with 0.60 µg g−1 (w/v) DDVP.
Figure 1. Glutathione peroxidase activity of fat body (FB), gut (GT), and head (H) tissues of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva treated with varied concentration of DDVP solution.

Figure 2. Glutathione reductase activity of fat body (FB), gut (GT), and head (H) tissues of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva treated with varied concentration of DDVP solution.

Note: Each value is the mean of five repetitions ± SD. Significant difference in the treated groups from their corresponding control was indicated by alphabets (a-f) at p < 0.05.
Key: Control-larva treated with acetone in normal saline; D0.20-larva treated with 0.20 µg g−1 (w/v) DDVP; D0.30-larva treated with 0.30 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.40-larva treated with 0.40 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.50-larva treated with 0.50 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.60-larva treated with 0.60 µg g−1 (w/v) DDVP.
Figure 2. Glutathione reductase activity of fat body (FB), gut (GT), and head (H) tissues of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva treated with varied concentration of DDVP solution.

Figure 3. Glutathione transferase activity of fat body (FB), gut (GT), and head (H) tissues of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva treated with varied concentration of DDVP solution.

Note: Each value is the mean of five repetitions ± SD. Significant difference in the treated groups from their corresponding control was indicated by alphabets (a-f) at p < 0.05.
Key: Control-larva treated with acetone in normal saline; D0.20-larva treated with 0.20 µg g−1 (w/v) DDVP; D0.30-larva treated with 0.30 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.40-larva treated with 0.40 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.50-larva treated with 0.50 µg g−1 (w/v); DDVP D0.60-larva treated with 0.60 µg g−1 (w/v) DDVP.
Figure 3. Glutathione transferase activity of fat body (FB), gut (GT), and head (H) tissues of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva treated with varied concentration of DDVP solution.

Figure 4. Time-course glutathione transferase activity (GST) in the gut tissue of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva.

Note: Each value is the mean of three repetitions ± SD. Experiment was conducted at room temperature.
Figure 4. Time-course glutathione transferase activity (GST) in the gut tissue of Rynchophorous phoenicis larva.

Figure 5. Gel profile of crude extracts of gut of DDVP-treated Rynchophorus phoenicis larva.

Notes: STD: Standard molecular mass, L1: Crude extract from control larva at 0 h and crude extract from larva L2–2 h, L3–4 h, L4–6 h, L5–8 h, L6–10 h, L7–12 h after treatment with DDVP.
Figure 5. Gel profile of crude extracts of gut of DDVP-treated Rynchophorus phoenicis larva.

Figure 6. Elution profiles of glutathione transferase from the gut of (A) control R. phoenicis larva and (B) DDVP-treated R. phoenicis larva using ion exchange chromatography.

Notes: Crude enzyme was applied to a DEAE-Sephadex A50 (1.5 × 25 cm) column previously equilibrated with 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The protein was eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 and fractions of 5 mL each were collected. Fractions pooled: 33–37 (6B).
Figure 6. Elution profiles of glutathione transferase from the gut of (A) control R. phoenicis larva and (B) DDVP-treated R. phoenicis larva using ion exchange chromatography.

Figure 7. Elution profile of glutathione transferase on affinity chromatography-GSTrap 4B. Ion-exchange-purified enzyme was applied to a GSH-Sepharose 4B (1 × 1 cm) column previously equilibrated with PBS, pH 7.4.

Notes: The protein was eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 and fractions of 1 mL each were collected. Bound protein was eluted with 10 mM GSH in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 8.0. Fractions pooled: 13–18.
Figure 7. Elution profile of glutathione transferase on affinity chromatography-GSTrap 4B. Ion-exchange-purified enzyme was applied to a GSH-Sepharose 4B (1 × 1 cm) column previously equilibrated with PBS, pH 7.4.

Table 1. Summary of purification of rplGSTc

Figure 8. Electrophorectograms of purified rplGSTc on (A) 10% polyacylamide gel slab at room temperature and (B) Native gel of 10% polyacrylamide.

Notes: Standard proteins ranging from molecular weight (MW) 17.27–103.14 kDa. Standard proteins ranging from molecular weight (MW) 29–272 kDa.
Figure 8. Electrophorectograms of purified rplGSTc on (A) 10% polyacylamide gel slab at room temperature and (B) Native gel of 10% polyacrylamide.

Figure 9. Double reciprocal plot of rplGSTc-catalyzed reaction. (A) Plots of 1/vo vs. 1/[CDNB] at constant varied concentrations of GSH. (a) Secondary plot: plots of intercept or slopes in (A) vs. 1/[GSH]. (B) Plots of 1/vo vs. 1/[GSH] at constant varied concentrations of CDNB. (b) Secondary plot: plots of intercepts or slopes in (B) vs. 1/[CDNB].

Figure 9. Double reciprocal plot of rplGSTc-catalyzed reaction. (A) Plots of 1/vo vs. 1/[CDNB] at constant varied concentrations of GSH. (a) Secondary plot: plots of intercept or slopes in (A) vs. 1/[GSH]. (B) Plots of 1/vo vs. 1/[GSH] at constant varied concentrations of CDNB. (b) Secondary plot: plots of intercepts or slopes in (B) vs. 1/[CDNB].