11,650
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Cotton production and climatic factors: Studying the nature of its relationship by different statistical methods

| (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1292882 | Received 13 Oct 2016, Accepted 05 Feb 2017, Published online: 01 Mar 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Range and mean values of the independent variables for the two seasons and over all data

Figure 1. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (68 days) in the first season (I) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Notes: The soil texture was clay loam, with an alluvial substratum, (pH = 8.07). Total water consumptive use during the growing season supplied by surface irrigation was about 6,000 m3 ha−1. No rainfall occurred during the growing season. The sampling size was 261 plants (Sawan et al., Citation2005).
Figure 1. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (68 days) in the first season (I) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Figure 2. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (62 days) in the second season (II) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Notes: The soil texture was clay loam, with an alluvial substratum, (pH = 8.07). Total water consumptive use during the growing season supplied by surface irrigation was about 6,000 m3 ha−1. No rainfall occurred during the growing season. The sampling size was 358 plants (Sawan et al., Citation2005).
Figure 2. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (62 days) in the second season (II) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Table 2. Simple correlation values for the relationships between the independent variables and the studied dependent variable

Figure 3. Daily boll retention ratio during the production stage (68 days) in the first season (I) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E at an altitude 19 m), Egypt.

Notes: The soil texture was clay loam, with an alluvial substratum, (pH = 8.07). Total water consumptive use during the growing season supplied by surface irrigation was about 6,000 m3 ha−1. No rainfall occurred during the growing season. The sampling size was 261 plants (Sawan et al., Citation2002).
Figure 3. Daily boll retention ratio during the production stage (68 days) in the first season (I) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E at an altitude 19 m), Egypt.

Figure 4. Daily boll retention ratio during the production stage (62 days) in the second (II) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E at an altitude 19 m), Egypt.

Notes: The soil texture was clay loam, with an alluvial substratum, (pH = 8.07). Total water consumptive use during the growing season supplied by surface irrigation was about 6,000 m3 ha−1. No rainfall occurred during the growing season. The sampling size was 358 plants (Sawan et al., Citation2002).
Figure 4. Daily boll retention ratio during the production stage (62 days) in the second (II) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E at an altitude 19 m), Egypt.

Table 3. Selected factors and their relative contribution to variations of flower and boll production

Figure 5. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (60 days) in the first season (I) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Notes: The soil texture was clay loam, with an alluvial substratum, (pH = 8.07). Total water consumptive use during the growing season supplied by surface irrigation was about 6,000 m3 ha−1. No rainfall occurred during the growing season. The sampling size was 261 plants (Sawan et al., Citation1999).
Figure 5. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (60 days) in the first season (I) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Figure 6. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (60 days) in the second season (II) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Notes: The soil texture was clay loam, with an alluvial substratum, (pH = 8.07). Total water consumptive use during the growing season supplied by surface irrigation was about 6,000 m3 ha−1. No rainfall occurred during the growing season. The sampling size was 358 plants (Sawan et al., Citation1999).
Figure 6. Daily number of flowers and bolls during the production stage (60 days) in the second season (II) for the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown in uniform field trial at the experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Centre, Giza (30° N, 31°: 28′ E), Egypt.

Table 4. Range and mean value of the independent variables (climatic factors) during the four periods of flower and boll production stage

Table 5. Significant simple correlation values between the climatic factors and flower, boll production and boll retention ratio due to quarters of production stage

Table 6. Significant simple correlation values between the climatic factors and flower, boll production, and boll retention ratio due to quarters periods of production stage for the combined data of the two seasons (n = 30)

Table 7. Significant simple correlation values between the climatic factors and flower, boll production and boll retention ratio for combined data of the two seasons (n = 120)

Table 8. Significant simple correlation coefficient values between the production variables and the studied climatic factors for the daily and different intervals of days combined over both seasons

Table 9. The equations obtained for each of the studied cotton production variables for the five-day intervals and daily intervals combined over both seasons

Table 10. Mean, standard deviation, maximum and minimum values of the climatic factors during the flower and boll stage (initial time) and the 15 days prior to flowering or subsequent to boll setting for I and II season at Giza, Egypt

Table 11. Simple correlation coefficients (r) between climatic factors and number of flower and harvested bolls in initial time (0) and each of the 15-day periods before flowering in the first season (I)

Table 12. Simple correlation coefficients (r) between climatic factorsTable Footnotea and number of flower and harvested bolls in initial time (0) and each of the 15-day periods before flowering in the second season (II)

Table 13. Simple correlation coefficient (r) values between climatic factors and number of harvested bolls and retention ratio in initial time (0) and each of the 15-day periods after flowering in the first season (I).

Table 14. Simple correlation coefficient (r) values between climatic factorsTable Footnotea and number of harvested bolls and retention ratio in initial time (0) and each of the 15-day periods after flowering in the second season (II)

Table 15. The models obtained for the number of flowers and bolls per plant as functions of the climatic data derived from the 5, 10, and 15 day periods prior to flower opening in the two seasons (I, II)

Table 16. The models obtained for the number of bolls per plant as functions of the climatic data derived from the 5, 10, and 15 day periods after flower opening in the two seasons (I, II)

Table 17. Simple correlation coefficient (r) values between the independent variables and the dependent variables in the first season (I)

Table 18. Simple correlation coefficient (r) values between the independent variables and the dependent variables in the second season (II).

Table 19. Simple correlation coefficient (r) values between the independent variables and dependent variables in the combined two seasons (I and II)

Table 20. Model obtained for cotton production variables as functions of climatic data and soil moisture status in individual and combined seasons