3,635
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

Reconstruction for labial adhesion in postmenopausal woman using vulvoperineal flap

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 136-139 | Received 21 Dec 2018, Accepted 29 Mar 2019, Published online: 23 Apr 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Both labia majora are extensively fused. There are two pinholes, but we could not identify the clitoris, vestibule, labia minora, and external urethral meatus.

Figure 1. Both labia majora are extensively fused. There are two pinholes, but we could not identify the clitoris, vestibule, labia minora, and external urethral meatus.

Figure 2. A 3 × 7 cm vulvoperineal flap that incorporates the perforator from the superficial external pudendal artery as the vascular pedicle was designed.

Figure 2. A 3 × 7 cm vulvoperineal flap that incorporates the perforator from the superficial external pudendal artery as the vascular pedicle was designed.

Figure 3. Bilateral 3 × 7 cm vulvoperineal flaps incorporating the perforator from the superficial external pudendal artery as the vascular pedicle were designed.

Figure 3. Bilateral 3 × 7 cm vulvoperineal flaps incorporating the perforator from the superficial external pudendal artery as the vascular pedicle were designed.

Figure 4. The patient’s urinary function is normal with no recurrence of labial adhesion.

Figure 4. The patient’s urinary function is normal with no recurrence of labial adhesion.