Causes and consequences of crude oil pipeline vandalism in the Niger delta region of Nigeria: A confirmatory factor analysis approach

Figures & data

Table 1. Environmental awareness of the respondents

Awareness	Frequency	Percent (%)
Very important	247	91.8
Rather important	11	4.1
Not very important	6	2.2
Not important	5	1.9
Total	269	100

Figure 1. Measurement model of the study.

Figure 2. Estimated structural model.

Table 2. Unstandardized and standardized regression weight in the hypothesized path model

Hypothesized relationships			B	SE	Β	CR	P
VA	<—	PM	.158	.062	.197	2.564	.010
VA	<—	CR	−.011	.051	−.014	−.208	.835
VA	<—	MA	.060	.071	.055	.842	.400
VA	<—	PF	.032	.051	.038	.642	.521
VA	<—	LF	.215	.105	.138	2.059	.039
VA	<—	GV	.425	.071	.464	6.024	.000
VA	<—	ED	.728	.541	.157	1.345	.053
VA	<—	MG	−.244	.073	−.269	−3.359	.000
VA	<—	UE	.004	.051	.006	.081	.935
VA	<—	UD	.094	.060	.116	1.553	.120
VA	<—	PV	.003	.074	.003	.042	.967

Note: B = Unstandardized regression weight, β = Standardized regression weight; SE = Standard error, CR = Critical ratio, P = p-value; VA, PM, CR, MA, PF, LF, GV, ED, MG, UE, UD, PV.