982
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

Determinants of capital adequacy and voluntary capital buffer among microfinance institutions in an emerging market

ORCID Icon
Article: 2285142 | Received 02 Mar 2023, Accepted 14 Nov 2023, Published online: 22 Nov 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Evolution of microfinance in Ghana.

This Figure provides a brief description of the major timelines showing the changes that the Microfinance sector went through in Ghana in the pre- and post-independence contexts.
Figure 1. Evolution of microfinance in Ghana.

Table 1. Financial sector statistics, Share and asset value

Figure 2. Conceptual framework on the determinants of capital adequacy of MFIs.

Source: Conceptualized by Author
Figure 2. Conceptual framework on the determinants of capital adequacy of MFIs.

Table 2. Description of variables

Table 3. Descriptive statistics – pooled, deposit-taking and non-deposit-taking MFIs

Table 4. Correlation and variance inflation factor

Figure 3. Determinants of capital adequacy ratio among deposit-taking microfinance firms.

Note – We report regression coefficients under the two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression with an instrumental variable for non-deposit-taking Microfinance Institutions. The diagram shows the alternatives when profitability or loan to asset is included. We assume 95% confidence level for the confidence interval (CI). Also, “***”, “**” and “*” represents significant levels at 1%, 5% and 10%, respectively.
Figure 3. Determinants of capital adequacy ratio among deposit-taking microfinance firms.

Figure 4. Determinants of capital adequacy ratio among non-deposit-taking microfinance firms.

Note – We report regression coefficients under the two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression with an instrumental variable for non-deposit-taking Microfinance Institutions. The diagram shows the alternatives when profitability or loan to asset is included. We assume 95% confidence level for the confidence interval (CI). Also, “***”, “**” and “*” represents significant levels at 1%, 5% and 10%, respectively.
Figure 4. Determinants of capital adequacy ratio among non-deposit-taking microfinance firms.

Table 5. Determinants of capital adequacy of microfinance institutions—ROA model

Table 6. Determinants of capital adequacy of microfinance institutions—LOTA model

Figure 5. Interaction of profitability and equity to total assets on capital adequacy.

Note – We report OLS coefficients and scatter diagrams stratified based on the deposit-taking status of the MFIs. We assume 95% confidence level for the confidence interval (CI).
Figure 5. Interaction of profitability and equity to total assets on capital adequacy.

Table 7. Determinants of voluntary capital buffer (ROA model)

Table 8. Determinants of voluntary capital buffer (LOTA model)

Table 9. Voluntary capital buffer by deposit-taking and non-deposit-taking MFIs (ROA model)

Table 10. Voluntary capital buffer by deposit-taking and non-deposit-taking MFIs (LOTA model)

Supplemental material

Public Interest Statement.docx

Download MS Word (14.3 KB)

Author Biographies.docx

Download MS Word (13.3 KB)

Disclosure statement.docx

Download MS Word (12.6 KB)

Data availability statement

Data is available upon reasonable request.