861
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Extended Validity of the Energy Dependent Scattering Kernel within the Boltzmann Transport Equation

&

Figures & data

Figure 1. Comparison between total cross section based on the OM (Koning and Delaroche Citation2003) and ENDF/B-VIII library for Fe56.

Figure 1. Comparison between total cross section based on the OM (Koning and Delaroche Citation2003) and ENDF/B-VIII library for Fe56.

Figure 2. Comparison between the OM (Koning-Delaroche) and ENDF/B-VIII (Brown et al. Citation2018) and JEFF (JEFF Citation2017) libraries for W182.

Figure 2. Comparison between the OM (Koning-Delaroche) and ENDF/B-VIII (Brown et al. Citation2018) and JEFF (JEFF Citation2017) libraries for W182.

Figure 3. Elastic scattering cross section of the ENDF/B-VII library (Chadwick et al. Citation2006) for W182.

Figure 3. Elastic scattering cross section of the ENDF/B-VII library (Chadwick et al. Citation2006) for W182.

Figure 4. OM based angular scattering kernel for Fe56 at 25 keV for the original.

Potential (53 MeV) and two arbitraries at 50 and 56 MeV. The scattering is almost isotropic for all cases.

Figure 4. OM based angular scattering kernel for Fe56 at 25 keV for the original.Potential (53 MeV) and two arbitraries at 50 and 56 MeV. The scattering is almost isotropic for all cases.

Figure 5. “Classical” momentum and energy dependent angular scattering kernel (EquationEquation 1) at 25 keV for Fe56 with temperature of 1200 K the angle dependent anisotropy is well pronounced.

Figure 5. “Classical” momentum and energy dependent angular scattering kernel (EquationEquation 1(1) σsT(E→E′,Ω→→Ω→′)=12πσsT(E→E′,μ0lab)=12πv(A+1A)4(Aπ)3/2∫2πu2du∫dμu∫c2dc∫(u′)2du′∫dμu′∫2 sin φδ(u′−u)(u′)2exp [v2−(A+1)(u2A+c2)]1uvcδ[μu−(v2−c2−u2)2uc]12u′ckBTδ[μu′−(v′)2−(u′)2−c22u′c]4vv′c2B0′δ( cos φ− cos φ̂)uσs(Er)P(u,μ0cm)2πd cos φ(1) ) at 25 keV for Fe56 with temperature of 1200 K the angle dependent anisotropy is well pronounced.

Figure 6. OM based angular scattering kernel forW182 at 10 keV. The scattering is quite isotropic. The difference between lowest and highest value is about 6%.

Figure 6. OM based angular scattering kernel forW182 at 10 keV. The scattering is quite isotropic. The difference between lowest and highest value is about 6%.

Figure 7. Momentum and energy dependent angular scattering kernel (EquationEquation 1) at10 keV for W182 with temperature of 1000 K. The difference between lowest and highest value is almost factor 6.

Figure 7. Momentum and energy dependent angular scattering kernel (EquationEquation 1(1) σsT(E→E′,Ω→→Ω→′)=12πσsT(E→E′,μ0lab)=12πv(A+1A)4(Aπ)3/2∫2πu2du∫dμu∫c2dc∫(u′)2du′∫dμu′∫2 sin φδ(u′−u)(u′)2exp [v2−(A+1)(u2A+c2)]1uvcδ[μu−(v2−c2−u2)2uc]12u′ckBTδ[μu′−(v′)2−(u′)2−c22u′c]4vv′c2B0′δ( cos φ− cos φ̂)uσs(Er)P(u,μ0cm)2πd cos φ(1) ) at10 keV for W182 with temperature of 1000 K. The difference between lowest and highest value is almost factor 6.