848
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Modified Fokker-Planck Acceleration for Forward-Peaked Transport Problems in Slab Geometry

, &

Figures & data

Figure 1. MFPA algorithm.

Figure 1. MFPA algorithm.

Table 1. Problem parameters.

Figure 2. Screened Rutherford Kernels.

Figure 2. Screened Rutherford Kernels.

Figure 3. Results for SRK problems with η=107.

Figure 3. Results for SRK problems with η=10−7.

Table 2. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 1 with SRK.

Table 3. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 2 with SRK.

Figure 4. Log scale of % relative error vs. η for Problem 1 at the center of the slab with SRK.

Figure 4. Log scale of % relative error vs. η for Problem 1 at the center of the slab with SRK.

Table 4. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 1 with SRK.

Table 5. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 2 with SRK.

Figure 5. Exponential Kernels.

Figure 5. Exponential Kernels.

Figure 6. Results for EK Problems with Δ=107.

Figure 6. Results for EK Problems with Δ=10−7.

Table 6. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 1 with EK.

Table 7. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 2 with EK.

Table 8. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 1 with EK.

Table 9. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 2 with EK.

Figure 7. Henyey–Greenstein Kernels.

Figure 7. Henyey–Greenstein Kernels.

Figure 8. Results for HGK Problems with g = 0.99.

Figure 8. Results for HGK Problems with g = 0.99.

Table 10. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 1 with HGK.

Table 11. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 2 with HGK.

Table 12. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 1 with HGK.

Table 13. Runtime and iteration counts for Problem 2 with HGK.

Figure 9. Results for heterogeneous Problem 1 using SRK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 9. Results for heterogeneous Problem 1 using SRK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 10. Results for heterogeneous Problem 2 using SRK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 10. Results for heterogeneous Problem 2 using SRK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 11. Results for heterogeneous Problem 1 using EK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 11. Results for heterogeneous Problem 1 using EK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 12. Results for heterogeneous Problem 2 using EK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 12. Results for heterogeneous Problem 2 using EK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 13. Results for heterogeneous Problem 1 using HGK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 13. Results for heterogeneous Problem 1 using HGK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 14. Results for heterogeneous Problem 2 using HGK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Figure 14. Results for heterogeneous Problem 2 using HGK with ϵ=±0.4,±0.8.

Table 14. Theoretical spectral radius results for MFPA.

Figure 15. Results of ρth for SRK, EK, and HGK.

Figure 15. Results of ρth for SRK, EK, and HGK.