Figures & data
Figure 4. Fatigue strength S-N curve for restorative material used (Homaei et al. Citation2016).
![Figure 4. Fatigue strength S-N curve for restorative material used (Homaei et al. Citation2016).](/cms/asset/a9f16840-73db-4a6c-adcc-6cfea4f2a2e9/tbbe_a_2303121_f0004_b.gif)
Table 1. Material properties for the restored first molar model.
Figure 6. Max tensile stress for the three groups studied under axial compressive load =150 N for zirconia crown, a) group a, b) group b, c) group c.
![Figure 6. Max tensile stress for the three groups studied under axial compressive load =150 N for zirconia crown, a) group a, b) group b, c) group c.](/cms/asset/c4cab35a-d4ad-4b49-86f8-a3aa319eb152/tbbe_a_2303121_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Survival rates the three groups tested under two loading conditions, a) axial loading, b) axial followed by 0.8 mm sliding.
![Figure 7. Survival rates the three groups tested under two loading conditions, a) axial loading, b) axial followed by 0.8 mm sliding.](/cms/asset/3eabe685-08c1-4ae3-8cab-5aa95f897edc/tbbe_a_2303121_f0007_b.gif)
Table 2. Shear stress at the dentin-adhesive interface [MPa].