Figures & data
Figure 1. Comparison of age-at-onset for MFH patients according to the genotype of nucleotides 16304 in the mitochondrial D-loop with the Kaplan–Meier method.
![Figure 1. Comparison of age-at-onset for MFH patients according to the genotype of nucleotides 16304 in the mitochondrial D-loop with the Kaplan–Meier method.](/cms/asset/1db6d01b-6c03-4a4a-882e-eaa5fc0c89bc/tmdn_a_1619492_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Comparison of age-at-onset for MFH patients according to the genotype of nucleotide AC523-524del in the mitochondrial D-loop with the Kaplan–Meier method.
![Figure 2. Comparison of age-at-onset for MFH patients according to the genotype of nucleotide AC523-524del in the mitochondrial D-loop with the Kaplan–Meier method.](/cms/asset/42f56a31-1049-416d-bebf-596a3cd22519/tmdn_a_1619492_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and their association with age-at-onset age in MFH patients.
Table 2. The 27 SNP sites with a rare allele frequency higher than 5% and their associations with metastasis and relapse in MFH patients by Kaplan–Meier method.
Figure 3. Comparison of age-at-onset for MFH patients according to the tumor location by the Kaplan–Meier method.
![Figure 3. Comparison of age-at-onset for MFH patients according to the tumor location by the Kaplan–Meier method.](/cms/asset/bef1937e-0541-4ff0-a2d7-e3dae0314ae1/tmdn_a_1619492_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 3. Correlation of metastasis and relapse with other clinical characteristics in MFH patients.