Advanced search
Publication Cover
Mitochondrial DNA Part B
Resources
Volume 6, 2021 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
502
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The complete mitochondrial genome of Heniochus chrysostomus (Perciformes, Chaetodontidae)

Wei Yua Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, China;c School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Yukai Yanga Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Zhanhui Qia Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Binbin Shana Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Xiaolin Huanga Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Yan Liua Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Heizhao Lina Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Tao Lia Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Zhong Huanga Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
,
Zhenhua Maa Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Chuanpeng Zhoua Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
&
Changping Yanga Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Province, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China;b Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, ChinaView further author information
 show all
Pages 933-935 | Received 09 Dec 2020, Accepted 05 Feb 2021, Published online: 16 Mar 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of 22 complete mitogenomic sequences using the maximum likelihood method. Compared species: Lutjanus bengalensis, Lutjanus kasmira, Lutjanus carponotatus, Lutjanus fulviflamma, Lutjanus guttatus, Lutjanus peru, Lutjanus argentimaculatus, Lutjanus erythropterus, Pterocaesio digramma, Caesio cuning, Pterocaesio tile, Heniochus diphreutes, Chelmon rostratus, Paracanthurus hepatus, Monodactylus argenteus, Emmelichthys struhsakeri, Siganus vulpinus, Gymnosarda unicolor, Thunnus tonggol, Thunnus albacares.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of 22 complete mitogenomic sequences using the maximum likelihood method. Compared species: Lutjanus bengalensis, Lutjanus kasmira, Lutjanus carponotatus, Lutjanus fulviflamma, Lutjanus guttatus, Lutjanus peru, Lutjanus argentimaculatus, Lutjanus erythropterus, Pterocaesio digramma, Caesio cuning, Pterocaesio tile, Heniochus diphreutes, Chelmon rostratus, Paracanthurus hepatus, Monodactylus argenteus, Emmelichthys struhsakeri, Siganus vulpinus, Gymnosarda unicolor, Thunnus tonggol, Thunnus albacares.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [National Center for Biotechnology Information] at [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/], reference number [MW136414].

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.