Improved Burner Efficiency and Fuel Consumption in Domestic Cooking Appliances

Figures & data

Figure 1. A Typical Brass Burner without Sudden Expansion.⁴

Figure 2. Schematic of the Proposed Burner, Showing the Sudden Expansion Section.

Figure 3. Loss Coefficients, K, with Sudden Expansion and Contraction.¹⁰

Figure 4. Performance in Terms of Head Loss, h_L against Height of Burner, h.

Figure 5. Thermal Efficiency for Different Burner Dimensions.

Table 1. Standard Dimensions for Burners.³

Country	Name	Nozzle diam. (mm)	Burner (mm)	D (mm)
Indonesia	Zeppelin	0.30	61	38.5
	Penguin	0.60	74	47.0
	Butterfly	0.65	100	60.0
	Bee & Butterfly	0.75	114	69.5
	Champion	0.80	117	69.5
India	Naaz de Lux	0.35	53	38.0
			53	38.0
	Super JLH	0.40	71	43.4
		0.45	71	43.4

Figure 6. Graph of Number of Pulses versus Time (min) for Burner Types.

Figure 7. Graph of Number of Pulses versus Time (min) for Fuel Types.

C. Pereira. Atomization and Combustion of Liquids. M.Sc. Thesis, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon, Portugal, 2012.

 Google Scholar

H. Kim. Numerical and Experimental Study on Dynamics of Unsteady Pipe Flow Involving Backflow Prevention Assemblies. Um13551503, ProQuest LLC, 2013.

 Google Scholar

V. Jozsa; A. Kun-Balog. Stability and Emission Analysis of Crude Rapeseed Oil Combustion. Fuel Processing Technology. 2017, 156, 204–210.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar