ABSTRACT
Plants and insects are the two dominant groups in terrestrial ecosystems, and insect damage on fossil plants is the only direct evidence documenting the past ecological history between these two, hyperdiverse groups. We describe, analyze, and interpret plant–insect interactions of a lower Cenomanian paleoforest from western France – the Puy-Puy Quarry of the Nouvelle-Aquitaine Region. We examined 1605 fossil leaves, axes, and reproductive material of bennettitalean, pinalean, and ginkgoalean gymnosperms; lauralean and magnolialean angiosperms; and pteridophyte fronds. We identified functional feeding groups (FFGs) and insect damage types (DTs) preserved on this foliage and data were rarified to indicate sample completeness. By employing R, various statistical parameters were calculated. We established 71 DTs for the nine FFGs of hole feeding, margin feeding, skeletonization, surface feeding, oviposition, piercing and sucking, galling, mining, and pathogens, and 1292 feeding event occurrences. Of the specimens examined 22.2% exhibited one or more DT, with angiosperms the most affected plant group. The most diverse interactions were mining and galling, indicating a mosaic of humid and xeric habitats, respectively, for the Puy-Puy paleoforest, a conclusion consistent with previous paleontological and sedimentological interpretations. Elevated DT richness suggests long-standing ecological relationships between the plants and insects, representative of a mature forest.
Acknowledgments
We are greatly indebted to Patrick Chauvet, owner of the Puy-Puy quarry, who allowed our research team to work at Puy-Puy for several years. We thank Weiyudong Deng for helpful discussion. The paper has been improved by helpful comments from Robert A. Spicer and an anonymous reviewer. This is contribution 400 of the Evolution of Terrestrial Ecosystems consortium at the National Museum of Natural History, in Washington, D.C.
Data availability
The data supporting the results are included in this article as supplementary file data and can be accessed here DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6535148
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2022.2092772
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.