Figures & data
Table 1. Data set usage within each of the three components
Figure 5 The where of U.S. retail centers in four contrasting urban and retail environments (maps not to scale).
![Figure 5 The where of U.S. retail centers in four contrasting urban and retail environments (maps not to scale).](/cms/asset/5af63a48-7ec9-415f-b7a2-8fec7ed6cd9c/raag_a_2098087_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 2. Variables used in construction of the retail center typology
Figure 6 Determining the optimal k value for retail center groups. Value in bold represents optimal k value.
![Figure 6 Determining the optimal k value for retail center groups. Value in bold represents optimal k value.](/cms/asset/076543ef-1fd4-452b-afbb-23560c50fffd/raag_a_2098087_f0006_b.jpg)
Table 3. Characteristics of the U.S. retail center types
Table 4. The observed relationship between U.S. retail center scale and function
Figure 9 Comparing the (A) observed and (B) predicted patronage probabilities for Downtown Boulder (maps not to scale).
![Figure 9 Comparing the (A) observed and (B) predicted patronage probabilities for Downtown Boulder (maps not to scale).](/cms/asset/b71d9ad6-1b29-40bb-864d-9ebf10dedd94/raag_a_2098087_f0009_c.jpg)
Table 5. Correlation testing of observed probabilities against predicted probabilities from Huff models with different α and β values
Figure 10 Primary catchment for Downtown Boulder, where the Huff model (A) has and (B) has not accounted for retail center type.
![Figure 10 Primary catchment for Downtown Boulder, where the Huff model (A) has and (B) has not accounted for retail center type.](/cms/asset/6da8997d-3a7f-476f-8eac-7cf7a9783245/raag_a_2098087_f0010_c.jpg)
Table 6. Calibrate Huff model parameters for each retail center type.