Figures & data
Figure 1. Changes of gray surfaces during fractal calculation, (a) δ = 1, (b) δ = 1/2, (c) δ = 1/4, (d) δ = 1/8.
![Figure 1. Changes of gray surfaces during fractal calculation, (a) δ = 1, (b) δ = 1/2, (c) δ = 1/4, (d) δ = 1/8.](/cms/asset/44f304b2-b8be-4271-8300-1b8d5448748a/icsu_a_1560081_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Distribution conditions of fractal dimensions of tongue coating texture in 499 normal tongue pictures and 88 thick/greasy tongue pictures.
![Figure 2. Distribution conditions of fractal dimensions of tongue coating texture in 499 normal tongue pictures and 88 thick/greasy tongue pictures.](/cms/asset/41262e6a-6914-4ffe-a263-38bc8d39dd13/icsu_a_1560081_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Testing results of characteristic parameters of multiple fractal spectrums of digitized tongue pictures.
![Figure 3. Testing results of characteristic parameters of multiple fractal spectrums of digitized tongue pictures.](/cms/asset/b7a02a15-b9aa-4117-bb65-eaca4b0f1dea/icsu_a_1560081_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Statistics of comparison results between normal tongue pictures and greasy characteristic parameter spectrums.
![Figure 4. Statistics of comparison results between normal tongue pictures and greasy characteristic parameter spectrums.](/cms/asset/02db962c-4db0-4ffc-9d2f-048dbc58c69d/icsu_a_1560081_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Statistics of comparison results of characteristic parameter spectrums between thin and thick tongue coating.
![Figure 5. Statistics of comparison results of characteristic parameter spectrums between thin and thick tongue coating.](/cms/asset/0031ad7b-b92d-4203-80a5-cd75a77bd9e5/icsu_a_1560081_f0005_c.jpg)