1,161
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of different feedback variants on pacing adherence in a field based running test

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1015-1028 | Received 04 Jun 2021, Accepted 12 Aug 2021, Published online: 31 Aug 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Boxplot of adherence achieved with the feedback variants during complete trials (n = 48). *** significant difference (p < .001). ** significant difference (p < .01)

Figure 1. Boxplot of adherence achieved with the feedback variants during complete trials (n = 48). *** significant difference (p < .001). ** significant difference (p < .01)

Figure 2. Changes in adherence with increasing speed for the different feedback variants. Each sub figure shows the mean adherence (y-axis) at a given target speed (x-axis) for a feedback variant (n = 48). Data was only included up to the 10kmh−1 stage in order to have an equal amount of values per target speed. *** significant difference (p < .001), ** significant difference (p < .01), * significant difference (p < .05)

Figure 2. Changes in adherence with increasing speed for the different feedback variants. Each sub figure shows the mean adherence (y-axis) at a given target speed (x-axis) for a feedback variant (n = 48). Data was only included up to the 10kmh−1 stage in order to have an equal amount of values per target speed. *** significant difference (p < .001), ** significant difference (p < .01), * significant difference (p < .05)

Figure 3. Coefficient of variation (CV) of adherence for different target speeds

Figure 3. Coefficient of variation (CV) of adherence for different target speeds

Figure 4. Adherence of the different feedback variants ordered by preference and the corresponding rankings by the athletes. (a) shows differences between the feedback variants preferred by the athletes. Pref. 1–4 describes the order of feedback variant preferred by the athletes. (b) bars indicating the frequency of a feedback ranked in the respective preference (1–4) by the athletes

Figure 4. Adherence of the different feedback variants ordered by preference and the corresponding rankings by the athletes. (a) shows differences between the feedback variants preferred by the athletes. Pref. 1–4 describes the order of feedback variant preferred by the athletes. (b) bars indicating the frequency of a feedback ranked in the respective preference (1–4) by the athletes