Figures & data
Table 1. Statistical data of climate variables of Tabriz and Ahar stations.
Table 2. Selecting different modes for modeling soil temperature estimates with a delay of 2 days for depth of 5 cm.
Table 3. The results of modeling with Pearson VII kernel function-based GP models for Tabriz and Ahar at a depth of 5 cm.
Figure 3. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – Pearson VII kernel function-based GP model, testing period.
![Figure 3. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – Pearson VII kernel function-based GP model, testing period.](/cms/asset/eb1bca12-2712-4c47-9f8f-18ca0258fac2/tgel_a_1610841_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – Pearson VII kernel function-based GP model, testing period.
![Figure 4. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – Pearson VII kernel function-based GP model, testing period.](/cms/asset/1792f6f9-ff51-4550-822f-88f756e41c7a/tgel_a_1610841_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – M5P model, testing period.
![Figure 5. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – M5P model, testing period.](/cms/asset/2fb8de83-8995-46c6-8298-0b50df140870/tgel_a_1610841_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 4. The results of modeling with M5P models for Tabriz and Ahar at a depth of 5 cm.
Figure 6. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – M5P model, testing period.
![Figure 6. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – M5P model, testing period.](/cms/asset/719d39c2-e100-41f2-ab29-83d7b701fd8b/tgel_a_1610841_f0006_oc.jpg)
Table 5. The results of modeling with RF models for Tabriz and Ahar at a depth of 5 cm.
Figure 7. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – RF model, testing period.
![Figure 7. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – RF model, testing period.](/cms/asset/378ac3d5-bc8d-4cd6-aa5b-b3ebf9b8355e/tgel_a_1610841_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – RF model, testing period.
![Figure 8. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – RF model, testing period.](/cms/asset/02e9fec5-6470-490a-88e8-02cbba17f7f5/tgel_a_1610841_f0008_oc.jpg)
Table 6. Structure of the MLP-based model.
Table 7. The results of modeling with MLP models for Tabriz and Ahar at a depth of 5 cm.
Figure 9. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – MLP model, testing period.
![Figure 9. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Tabriz metrological station – MLP model, testing period.](/cms/asset/1e45240a-13c3-4f42-808f-0cfa6b9dc7d9/tgel_a_1610841_f0009_oc.jpg)
Figure 10. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – MLP model, testing period.
![Figure 10. Comparison of actual and predicted soil temperature at 5 cm and agreement diagram for Ahar metrological station – MLP model, testing period.](/cms/asset/c8264005-5c70-457b-99ad-147dd394b560/tgel_a_1610841_f0010_oc.jpg)
Table 8. The results of different modeling approaches for Tabriz at a depth of 5 cm.
Figure 11. Agreement plot of actual and predicted values of soil temperature at 5 cm for Tabriz metrological station – using MLP, M5P, RF, and GP-based models model, testing period.
![Figure 11. Agreement plot of actual and predicted values of soil temperature at 5 cm for Tabriz metrological station – using MLP, M5P, RF, and GP-based models model, testing period.](/cms/asset/b68bc233-6496-417b-b087-980cc7418d4c/tgel_a_1610841_f0011_oc.jpg)
Table 9. The results of different modeling approaches for Ahar at a depth of 5 cm.