1,504
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Sedimentology and compositional characteristics of siliciclastic and associated sediments in Ruvu basin: implication on paleo-depositional environment, provenance, and tectonic setting

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 356-368 | Received 04 Jun 2021, Accepted 07 Oct 2021, Published online: 31 Dec 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Geological map of Ruvu basin (modified after Kent, Citation1954).

Figure 1. Geological map of Ruvu basin (modified after Kent, Citation1954).

Table 1. Trace elements and rare earth elements (REE).

Table 2. Ratios of trace elements and rare earth elements (REE).

Figure 2. Msata formation. a) Matrix-supported conglomerate with clastic, granitic gneiss (black circle), mudstone (black arrow), precipitated calcite (red arrow) and pebble imbrications (black circle). b) Clast supported conglomerate with clastic, granitic gneiss (blue arrows), fossils fragments; brachiopods (black arrows) and gastropods (red arrow). c) Bioclastic matrix-supported conglomerate, it is highly weathered. d) Massive calcareous sandstone; brachiopods fragment (black circle). e) Fossiliferous calcareous sandstone with different fossils fragments like shells of brachiopods, bivalves, and gastropods. f) Planar bedded calcareous sandstone.

Figure 2. Msata formation. a) Matrix-supported conglomerate with clastic, granitic gneiss (black circle), mudstone (black arrow), precipitated calcite (red arrow) and pebble imbrications (black circle). b) Clast supported conglomerate with clastic, granitic gneiss (blue arrows), fossils fragments; brachiopods (black arrows) and gastropods (red arrow). c) Bioclastic matrix-supported conglomerate, it is highly weathered. d) Massive calcareous sandstone; brachiopods fragment (black circle). e) Fossiliferous calcareous sandstone with different fossils fragments like shells of brachiopods, bivalves, and gastropods. f) Planar bedded calcareous sandstone.

Figure 3. Msata formation. (a) convolute calcareous sandstone, (b) calcareous nodules, (c) fine stratified calcareous sandstone, and (d) finely laminated shale (black arrows) interbedded with sandstone/siltstone (red arrows).

Figure 3. Msata formation. (a) convolute calcareous sandstone, (b) calcareous nodules, (c) fine stratified calcareous sandstone, and (d) finely laminated shale (black arrows) interbedded with sandstone/siltstone (red arrows).

Figure 4. Stratigraphic section of the Msata succession showing features, facies association and depositional environment adapted from Kabohola (Citation2017).

Figure 4. Stratigraphic section of the Msata succession showing features, facies association and depositional environment adapted from Kabohola (Citation2017).

Figure 5. Synthesized lithostratigraphy of the basin.

Figure 5. Synthesized lithostratigraphy of the basin.

Figure 6. Average chondrite-normalized REE values for the siliciclastic sediments of the Ruvu basin. Chondrite values adapted from McLennan et al. (Citation1980).

Figure 6. Average chondrite-normalized REE values for the siliciclastic sediments of the Ruvu basin. Chondrite values adapted from McLennan et al. (Citation1980).

Figure 7. Distribution of (Zr + Rb)/Sr ratio versus samples.

Figure 7. Distribution of (Zr + Rb)/Sr ratio versus samples.

Figure 8. V/Cr against elemental index plot.

Figure 8. V/Cr against elemental index plot.

Figure 9. Tectonic setting discriminant factor plot of the Karoo sandstone.

Figure 9. Tectonic setting discriminant factor plot of the Karoo sandstone.

Figure 10. Tectonic setting discriminant of mid-Jurassic to Cretaceous sediments.

Figure 10. Tectonic setting discriminant of mid-Jurassic to Cretaceous sediments.