Figures & data
Table 1. Comparison of the demographical and clinical data of patients using sertraline or agomelatine.
Figure 1. The changes in the mean PSQI scores of the study groups in the follow-up period. +The decline of PSQI scores in sertraline group throughout the follow-up period (effect size (η2) = 0.51). ++The decline of PSQI scores in agomelatine group throughout the follow-up period (effect size (η2) = 0.56). +++The difference in decline of PSQI scores between study groups (effect size (η2) = 0.87).
![Figure 1. The changes in the mean PSQI scores of the study groups in the follow-up period. +The decline of PSQI scores in sertraline group throughout the follow-up period (effect size (η2) = 0.51). ++The decline of PSQI scores in agomelatine group throughout the follow-up period (effect size (η2) = 0.56). +++The difference in decline of PSQI scores between study groups (effect size (η2) = 0.87).](/cms/asset/195343dd-b0ed-4a3f-8955-2b62a4680ba1/tbcp_a_1490096_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. The changes in the mean ASEX scores of the study groups in the follow-up period. +The decline of ASEX scores in sertraline group throughout the follow-up period. ++The decline of ASEX scores in agomelatine group throughout the follow-up period (effect size (η2) = 0.20). +++The difference in decline of ASEX scores between study groups.
![Figure 2. The changes in the mean ASEX scores of the study groups in the follow-up period. +The decline of ASEX scores in sertraline group throughout the follow-up period. ++The decline of ASEX scores in agomelatine group throughout the follow-up period (effect size (η2) = 0.20). +++The difference in decline of ASEX scores between study groups.](/cms/asset/0df45c01-02ca-4162-9dfe-664fb1c90bc2/tbcp_a_1490096_f0002_oc.jpg)