Figures & data
Figure 1. The latency of the hind paw licking or jumping of groups on the hot plate test. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of 7–9 mice. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; compared with control group. One-way ANOVA; post hoc Tukey test was used for statistical analysis.
Figure 2. The latency of hind paw licking or jumping of groups on the hot plate test. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of 7–9 mice. *p < 0.05 compared with control group. One-way ANOVA; post hoc Tukey test was used for statistical analysis.
Figure 3. The latency of the hind paw licking or jumping of groups on the hot plate test. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of 7–9 mice. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 compared with control group. One-way ANOVA; post hoc Tukey test was used for statistical analysis. To test the differences in the repeated tests of the same drug treatment applied mice, we used one-way, within-subjects ANOVA.
