Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the tolerance for mental pain scale-10

Figures & data

Figure 1. The flow-chart for enrolment of the participants.

Table 1. The TMPS-10 scores and the sociodemographic features of the participants.

		Depression	Control	Total group
TMPS10	Min.	10	32	10
	Max.	38	50	50
	$\overline{X}$	22.54	43.01	32.03
		Depression	Control	p
Gender, n (%)
Female		88 (72.7)	71 (67.6)	0.489
Male		33 (27.3)	34 (32.4)
Marital status, n (%)
Single		59 (48.8)	63 (60.0)	0.119
Married		62 (51.2)	42 (40.0)
Place of residence, n (%)
Urban		88 (72.7)	82 (78.1)	0.437
Rural		33 (27.3)	23 (21.9)
Medical history, n (%)
Yes		27 (22.3)	21 (20.0)	0.794
No		94 (77.7)	84 (79.0)
Age, (Mean ± SD)		35.21 ± 11.17	34.80 ± 6.73	0.737
Years of education, (Mean ± SD)		10.88 ± 2.89	10.28 ± 2.94	0.124

Figure 2. Two-factor structure of TMPS-10.

Table 2. Single and two-factor confirmatory factor analysis of TMPS-10.

	χ^2	χ^2/df	p	CFI	GFI	NFI	RMSEA	Factor loads		Error variances
								Max.	Min.	Max.	Min.
Two factor	78.18	2.30	0.000	0.99	0.91	0.99	0.076	0.94	0.87	0.24	0.11
Single factor	77.89	2.23	0.000	0.99	0.91	0.99	0.074	0.94	0.87	0.24	0.11
Recommended value		χ^2/df ≤ 3		≥0.90	≥0.90	≥0.90	≤0.080	≥0.30		≤0.90

CFI, comparative fit index; GFI, goodness of fit index; NFI, Normed Fit Index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation.

Figure 3. Single-factor structure of TMPS-10.

Table 3. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis according to diagnosis for TMPS-10.

	χ^2	χ^2/df	χ^2	CFI	IFI	NFI	RMSEA
Scale	197.93	2.38	<0.001	0.97	0.97	0.95	0.111
Recommended value		χ^2/df ≤ 3		≥0.90	≥0.90	≥0.90	≤0.080

CFI, comparative fit index; GFI, goodness of fit index; NFI, Normed Fit Index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation.

Table 4. The results of the discriminant analysis according to the diagnostic group.

			Estimated group memberships		Total
			Depression	Control
Observed group memberships	n	Depression	115	6	121
		Control	2	103	105
	%	Depression	95.0	5.0	100.0
		Control	1.9	98.1	100.0

Percentage of correct classification 96.5%.

Wilks’ Lambda = 0.317 (${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 255.376; p < 0.05).

Table 5. The results of discriminant analysis according to the presence of suicide attempt.

			Estimated group memberships
		Suicide	Yes	No	Total
Observed group memberships	n	Yes	49	13	62
		No	14	150	164
	%	Yes	79.0	21.0	100.0
		No	8.5	91.5	100.0

Percentage of correct classification 88.1%.

Wilks’ Lambda = 0.494 (${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 157.647; p < 0.05).