501
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles in the special topic of Bayesian analysis

Covariance estimation via fiducial inference

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 316-331 | Received 23 May 2020, Accepted 10 Jan 2021, Published online: 15 Feb 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. All the chains show good estimation of covariance matrix. The estimators are better than both the sample covariance matrix and the PDSCE estimator.

Figure 1. All the chains show good estimation of covariance matrix. The estimators are better than both the sample covariance matrix and the PDSCE estimator.

Figure 2. Similar to Figure , the fiducial estimators are better than both the sample covariance matrix and the PDSCE estimator in this case.

Figure 2. Similar to Figure 1, the fiducial estimators are better than both the sample covariance matrix and the PDSCE estimator in this case.

Figure 3. Result for k = 10, p = 200, n = 1000. The trace plot (top left) shows that the chains converge quickly. Although np is small, the sample covariance (bottom left) roughly captures the shape of true covariance (top right). The last panel (bottom right) shows that the fiducial estimate captures the true clique structure perfectly.

Figure 3. Result for k = 10, p = 200, n = 1000. The trace plot (top left) shows that the chains converge quickly. Although np is small, the sample covariance (bottom left) roughly captures the shape of true covariance (top right). The last panel (bottom right) shows that the fiducial estimate captures the true clique structure perfectly.

Figure 4. Confidence curve plots for estimated covariance matrix. k=10,p=200,n= 1000. Comparing to the sample covariance, the estimators are closer to Σ. The PDSCE estimator shows even smaller FM-distance to Σ, it, however, greatly overestimates detΣ.

Figure 4. Confidence curve plots for estimated covariance matrix. k=10,p=200,n= 1000. Comparing to the sample covariance, the estimators are closer to Σ. The PDSCE estimator shows even smaller FM-distance to Σ, it, however, greatly overestimates detΣ.

Figure 5. 95% coverage plots for 200 repeated simulations. k=10,p=200,n= 1000. The p-values (in green) roughly follow a uniform [0,1] distribution, and they lie inside of the envelope.

Figure 5. 95% coverage plots for 200 repeated simulations. k=10,p=200,n= 1000. The p-values (in green) roughly follow a uniform [0,1] distribution, and they lie inside of the envelope.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (2.7 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.