Figures & data
Table 1. Coverage probabilities (%) of the Wald and ELR confidence intervals with .
Table 2. Coverage probabilities (%) of the Wald and ELR confidence intervals with .
Figure 1. Rejection probabilities of the ELR (dashed line) and Wald (solid line) tests in Scenarios (A1) and (A2) (First row), and (A3) and (A4) (Second row) of Example 3.1.
![Figure 1. Rejection probabilities of the ELR (dashed line) and Wald (solid line) tests in Scenarios (A1) and (A2) (First row), and (A3) and (A4) (Second row) of Example 3.1.](/cms/asset/791fbdf0-a744-4c1c-8a68-046d875a2004/tstf_a_1946373_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Rejection probabilities of the ELR (dashed line) and Wald (solid line) tests in Scenarios (B1) and (B2) (First row), and (B3) and (B4) (Second row) of Example 3.2.
![Figure 2. Rejection probabilities of the ELR (dashed line) and Wald (solid line) tests in Scenarios (B1) and (B2) (First row), and (B3) and (B4) (Second row) of Example 3.2.](/cms/asset/ca26a3ed-bb7c-4558-bb57-055378f4c08d/tstf_a_1946373_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Rejection probabilities (%) of model checking of Examples 3.3 and 3.4.
Table 4. IH and outcome for Wilms tumour.
Figure 3. Histograms of Age in different combinations of outcome (Row 1, relapses or cases; Row 2, non-relapses or controls) and the stratum variable (IH; Column 1, unfavourable; Column 2, favourable).
![Figure 3. Histograms of Age in different combinations of outcome (Row 1, relapses or cases; Row 2, non-relapses or controls) and the stratum variable (IH; Column 1, unfavourable; Column 2, favourable).](/cms/asset/9252a0e5-78f2-414c-856b-0d0aea3180fa/tstf_a_1946373_f0003_ob.jpg)
Table 5. Results of regression parameter estimates in Wilms tumour study.