Figures & data
Table 1. Changes of E(γm), Dγ, and RDγ with the increase of m at different γ0 levels, where Dγ = 100(E(γm)−γ0)/γ0 and RDγ = 100(γm−γm+1)/γm+1
Figure 1. The m–E(γm) relationship curve at γ0 = 0.2 and 0.15 as determined by Equation (14).
![Figure 1. The m–E(γm) relationship curve at γ0 = 0.2 and 0.15 as determined by Equation (14).](/cms/asset/454a3b48-ac97-4fa1-ac61-29202d4f9921/oama_a_1551504_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Effects of γ0 levels on Dγ as defined by Equation (15) and RDγ as defined by Equation (16): a. Dγ at m = 5; b. Dγ at m = 2.
![Figure 2. Effects of γ0 levels on Dγ as defined by Equation (15) and RDγ as defined by Equation (16): a. Dγ at m = 5; b. Dγ at m = 2.](/cms/asset/8a0b8f0a-b2c1-47f0-bf41-f0487c3d76f2/oama_a_1551504_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Effects of m on γm at δ = 29% for analytic model = Anal-2: a. MI model = MI-1; b. MI model = MI-2.
![Figure 3. Effects of m on γm at δ = 29% for analytic model = Anal-2: a. MI model = MI-1; b. MI model = MI-2.](/cms/asset/a6585eb5-f4fd-42ef-b90a-eb9fb980ba8b/oama_a_1551504_f0003_b.gif)
Table 2. Coefficient of variations (%) of Bm, Um, and γm for SIZE100
Table 3. Comparison of different γ0 estimation methods for SIZE20 with imputation model = MI-2 and analytic model = Anal-2 in the PWS12 MI trials. The best γ̂0 was calculated by Equation (19) using (B̅100)/(U̅100) as the estimate of B0/U0, where B̅100 and U̅100 were the mean of the 30 replicates of B100 and U100, respectively