54
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Applying Normal PedEyeQ Thresholds to Assess Eye-related Quality of Life among Children with Strabismus

, D.B.O, , M.S., , C.C.R.P, , M.D., , Ph.D. & , B.M. B.Ch.
Pages 92-96 | Received 04 Aug 2021, Accepted 03 Jan 2022, Published online: 01 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To determine proportions of children with strabismus with below-normal Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ) scores.

Methods

Ninety-eight children with strabismus (70 aged 5–11 years; 28 aged 12–17 years) were evaluated. Children completed the Child 5–11 or 12–17 PedEyeQ (Functional Vision, Bothered by Eyes/vision, Social, and Frustration/worry domains). Parents completed the Proxy (same domains plus Eye Care) and Parent PedEyeQ (Impact on Parent and Family, Worry about Child’s Eye Condition, Worry about Child’s Self-perception and Interactions, and Worry about Functional Vision domains). Previously published normal (5th percentile) thresholds were applied to calculate proportions with below-normal scores for each domain.

Results

For the Child PedEyeQ more than 20% of 5- to 11-year-olds scored below normal, on all but the Social domain, whereas more than 50% of 12- to 17-year-olds scored below normal on all domains. On the Proxy PedEyeQ, more than 50% scored below normal on all domains when parents reported on 5- to 11-year-olds and 12- to 17-year-olds. For the Parent PedEyeQ, more than 50% of the parents of both 5- to 11-year-olds and 12- to 17-year-olds scored below normal on all domains.

Conclusions

The majority of children with strabismus have below-normal PedEyeQ scores, particularly children aged 12–17 years.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Role of the funder/sponsor

The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional information

Funding

Financial assistance for this study came from the National Institutes of Health Grants [EY024333 (JMH, PI & EEB, Co-I), EY011751 (JMH) and EY022313 (EEB)], and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 183.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.