138
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Microstructure and mechanical properties of a recycled aluminum alloy fabricated by consolidation of small pieces

& ORCID Icon
Article: 2345938 | Received 30 Dec 2023, Accepted 17 Apr 2024, Published online: 30 Apr 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Images of experimental materials at different steps: (a) small pieces cut from the four scrap AA6063 profiles, (b) blend of the small pieces from different scrap profiles, (c) a small piece compact, (d) a forging compact, (e) 9:1 rod, (f) 25:1 rod.

Figure 1. Images of experimental materials at different steps: (a) small pieces cut from the four scrap AA6063 profiles, (b) blend of the small pieces from different scrap profiles, (c) a small piece compact, (d) a forging compact, (e) 9:1 rod, (f) 25:1 rod.

Table 1. Compositions of four scrap AA6063 aluminum alloy profiles (wt.%).

Table 2. Composition of the 9:1 rod (wt.%).

Table 3. Relative densities of the small piece compact, forging compact and as-extruded rod.

Figure 2. SEM images of the microstructure of small pieces from the four scrap profiles: (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4.

Figure 2. SEM images of the microstructure of small pieces from the four scrap profiles: (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4.

Figure 3. Optical microscopy images of the microstructure of small pieces from the four scrap profiles: (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4.

Figure 3. Optical microscopy images of the microstructure of small pieces from the four scrap profiles: (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4.

Figure 4. SEM images and EDS spectra of the second phase particles in the microstructure of small pieces form the four scrap profiles: (a) and (b) 1, (c) and (d) 2, (e) and (f) 3, and (g) and (h) 4.

Figure 4. SEM images and EDS spectra of the second phase particles in the microstructure of small pieces form the four scrap profiles: (a) and (b) 1, (c) and (d) 2, (e) and (f) 3, and (g) and (h) 4.

Figure 5. XRD patterns of the as-extruded and heat-treated samples.

Figure 5. XRD patterns of the as-extruded and heat-treated samples.

Figure 6. Optical microscopy images of the microstructure of the four samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1, (c) 9-T6, (d) 25-T6.

Figure 6. Optical microscopy images of the microstructure of the four samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1, (c) 9-T6, (d) 25-T6.

Figure 7. SEM image and EDS elemental maps of the microstructure of two samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1.

Figure 7. SEM image and EDS elemental maps of the microstructure of two samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1.

Figure 8. SEM images of the microstructure of I and II regions in the as-extruded samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1.

Figure 8. SEM images of the microstructure of I and II regions in the as-extruded samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1.

Table 4. Compositions of different types of regions in the 9:1 sample (wt.%), determined by EDS area analysis.

Table 5. Compositions of different types of regions in the 25:1 sample (wt.%), determined by EDS area analysis.

Figure 9. EBSD band contrast and IPF contrast images of the microstructure of as-extruded samples: (a) and (b) 9:1, (c) and (d) 25:1.

Figure 9. EBSD band contrast and IPF contrast images of the microstructure of as-extruded samples: (a) and (b) 9:1, (c) and (d) 25:1.

Figure 10. EBSD band contrast and IPF contrast images of T6 heat-treated samples: (a) and (b) 9-T6, (c) and (d) 25-T6.

Figure 10. EBSD band contrast and IPF contrast images of T6 heat-treated samples: (a) and (b) 9-T6, (c) and (d) 25-T6.

Figure 11. The distributions of aspect ratios of the Al grains of T6 heat-treated samples: (a) 9-T6, (b) 25-T6.

Figure 11. The distributions of aspect ratios of the Al grains of T6 heat-treated samples: (a) 9-T6, (b) 25-T6.

Figure 12. Recrystallization distribution of grains in the four samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1, (c) 9-T6, (d) 25-T6, (e) histograms showing the fractions of different types of grains in the samples.

Figure 12. Recrystallization distribution of grains in the four samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1, (c) 9-T6, (d) 25-T6, (e) histograms showing the fractions of different types of grains in the samples.

Figure 13. SEM images of the microstructure of different types of regions of T6 heat-treated samples: (a) 9-T6, (b) 25-T6.

Figure 13. SEM images of the microstructure of different types of regions of T6 heat-treated samples: (a) 9-T6, (b) 25-T6.

Table 6. Compositions of different types of regions in the 9-T6 sample (wt.%), determined by EDS area analysis.

Table 7. Compositions of different types of regions in the 25-T6 sample (wt.%), determined by EDS area analysis.

Figure 14. Microhardness values of the samples.

Figure 14. Microhardness values of the samples.

Figure 15. Engineering stress-engineering strain curves of the samples.

Figure 15. Engineering stress-engineering strain curves of the samples.

Table 8. Tensile properties of the samples.

Figure 16. SEM images of the fracture surfaces of the tensile test specimens cut from the samples: (a) and (b) 9:1, (c) and (d) 25:1, (e) and (f) 9-T6, (g) and (h) 25-T6.

Figure 16. SEM images of the fracture surfaces of the tensile test specimens cut from the samples: (a) and (b) 9:1, (c) and (d) 25:1, (e) and (f) 9-T6, (g) and (h) 25-T6.

Figure 17. Longitudinal sections below the fracture surfaces of the tensile test specimens cut from the samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1, (c) 9-T6, (d) 25-T6.

Figure 17. Longitudinal sections below the fracture surfaces of the tensile test specimens cut from the samples: (a) 9:1, (b) 25:1, (c) 9-T6, (d) 25-T6.