Figures & data
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) of the base materials.
Figure 4. Pictures of furnace samples before carburizing by three different processes. (a) Process 1; (b) process 2 and (c) process 3.
![Figure 4. Pictures of furnace samples before carburizing by three different processes. (a) Process 1; (b) process 2 and (c) process 3.](/cms/asset/b102c26f-e9c6-4059-93c2-9d97fcae7e4c/thts_a_2350184_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Carburizing and quenching process.
Figure 5. Pictures of furnace samples after carburizing by three different processes. (a) Process 1; (b) process 2 and (c) process 3.
![Figure 5. Pictures of furnace samples after carburizing by three different processes. (a) Process 1; (b) process 2 and (c) process 3.](/cms/asset/2cdcb186-fba4-4703-9f16-38b39c786e07/thts_a_2350184_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Three different process carbon concentration test positions. (a) Test positions and (b) the schematic diagram of the testing area.
![Figure 7. Three different process carbon concentration test positions. (a) Test positions and (b) the schematic diagram of the testing area.](/cms/asset/df8c5c9a-71e1-4395-82e5-e68e3fdbf048/thts_a_2350184_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Comparison of experimental values and simulation values. (a) Simulation result point positions; (b) process 1; (c) process 2 and (d) process 3.
![Figure 8. Comparison of experimental values and simulation values. (a) Simulation result point positions; (b) process 1; (c) process 2 and (d) process 3.](/cms/asset/e6427dc1-934e-4bed-9fc4-a58e052ebdc0/thts_a_2350184_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. Microstructure after atmosphere carburizing. (a) Cylindrical sample; (b) sketch map; (c) surface; (d) sub-surface and (e) center.
![Figure 9. Microstructure after atmosphere carburizing. (a) Cylindrical sample; (b) sketch map; (c) surface; (d) sub-surface and (e) center.](/cms/asset/25552802-2caf-4536-b8a4-e610c8523f0f/thts_a_2350184_f0009_oc.jpg)
Figure 10. Microhardness profile of the carburized layer. (a) Indentation diagram and (b) three different process hardness gradients.
![Figure 10. Microhardness profile of the carburized layer. (a) Indentation diagram and (b) three different process hardness gradients.](/cms/asset/91d89e33-5a01-4341-8f35-15c0f7b5a82c/thts_a_2350184_f0010_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Simulation generates a training set scheme list.
Table 4. Six sets of carburizing process parameters.
Table 5. Simulation generates a training set scheme list.
Table 6. Three sets of carburizing process parameters.
Table 7. Comparison of prediction time and simulation calculation time.