4,052
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 90-98 | Received 10 Jun 2019, Accepted 13 Nov 2019, Published online: 12 Dec 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Overview of the restorative materials and respective manufacturers as well as the pretreatment of enamel and dentine for the materials investigated in this study.

Figure 1. Schematics of the cavity preparations for marginal assessments with margins in enamel (left) or dentine (right).

Figure 1. Schematics of the cavity preparations for marginal assessments with margins in enamel (left) or dentine (right).

Figure 2. Box-plot for shear bond strength (MPa) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of enamel after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 2. Box-plot for shear bond strength (MPa) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of enamel after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 3. Box-plot for shear bond strength (MPa) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of dentine after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 3. Box-plot for shear bond strength (MPa) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of dentine after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 4. Box-plot for wall-to-wall contraction (%) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of cavities with margins on enamel after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 4. Box-plot for wall-to-wall contraction (%) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of cavities with margins on enamel after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 5. Box-plot for wall-to-wall contraction (%) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of cavities with margins on dentine after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 5. Box-plot for wall-to-wall contraction (%) of the restorative materials according to pretreatment of cavities with margins on dentine after thermocycling and storage for 28 days. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 6. Box-plot for volumetric contraction (%) of the investigated restorative materials. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.

Figure 6. Box-plot for volumetric contraction (%) of the investigated restorative materials. The boxes include median and 25–75% quartiles, the whiskers represent the interquartile range. Different letters represent statistical significance.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (17.6 KB)