Figures & data
Table 1. Overview of the included studies and their setting parameters and results.
Table 2. Overview of the intraoral scanners (IOS), laboratory scanners, CAM systems, and zirconia materials used in the included studies.
Table 3. Fit and accuracy of the zirconia restorations in μm, for marginal, internal, and total gap.
Table 4. Fit and accuracy of zirconia restorations in μm, for marginal, internal, and total gap according to impression technique.
Cetik S, Bahrami B, Fossoyeux I, et al. Adaptation of zirconia crowns created by conventional versus optical impression: in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(3):208–216. Cunali RS, Saab RC, Correr GM, et al. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconia crowns: a comparative study of assessment methods. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):467–473. Dahl BE, Rønold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):400–404. Kocaağaoğlu H, Kilinç HI, Albayrak H. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(1):102–108. Miura S, Inagaki R, Kasahara S, et al. Fit of zirconia all-ceramic crowns with different cervical margin designs, before and after porcelain firing and glazing. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(4):484–489. Nelson N, K S J, Sunny K. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of dental copings fabricated by modern additive and subtractive digital technologies. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017;25(1):20–25. Pedroche LO, Bernardes SR, Leão MP, et al. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):e113. Lee JY, Choi SJ, Kim MS, et al. Effect of span length on the fit of zirconia framework fabricated using CAD/CAM system. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(2):118–125. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18(2):515–523. Dahl BE, Dahl JE, Rønold HJ. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126(1):66–73. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):400–407. Memarian M, Sadighpour L, Nosratpour R, et al. Marginal adaptation and internal fit of posterior 3-unit zirconia FPDs fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017;25(2):79–85. Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):362–367. Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Invest. 2016;20(2):283–289.