2,690
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study

, , &
Pages 159-166 | Received 22 Jun 2020, Accepted 13 Oct 2020, Published online: 03 Nov 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Characteristics of the resin-based composites tested according to manufacturer data when available.

Figure 1. Flexural modulus (Eflex, GPa) calculated after three-point bending test (n = 20). The materials are ranked in descending order based on their average values; standard deviations are added as horizontal whiskers for each histogram. Similar capital letters placed on the right side of the material names connect RCs presenting no statistically significant difference (p > .05). Dentin values appear for the sake of comparison: 18–25 GPa [Citation32].

Figure 1. Flexural modulus (Eflex, GPa) calculated after three-point bending test (n = 20). The materials are ranked in descending order based on their average values; standard deviations are added as horizontal whiskers for each histogram. Similar capital letters placed on the right side of the material names connect RCs presenting no statistically significant difference (p > .05). Dentin values appear for the sake of comparison: 18–25 GPa [Citation32].

Figure 2. – Flexural strength (σf, MPa) calculated after three-point bending test (n = 20). The materials are ranked in descending order based on their average values; standard deviations are added as horizontal whiskers for each histogram. Similar capital letters placed on the right side of the material names connect RCs presenting no statistically significant difference (p > .05). Dentin values appear for the sake of comparison: 52–105 MPa [Citation32].

Figure 2. – Flexural strength (σf, MPa) calculated after three-point bending test (n = 20). The materials are ranked in descending order based on their average values; standard deviations are added as horizontal whiskers for each histogram. Similar capital letters placed on the right side of the material names connect RCs presenting no statistically significant difference (p > .05). Dentin values appear for the sake of comparison: 52–105 MPa [Citation32].

Figure 3. – Inorganic filler content (%) measured by thermogravimetric analysis (n = 3). The materials are ranked in descending order based on their average values; standard deviations are added as horizontal whiskers for each histogram. Similar capital letters placed on the right side of the material names connect RCs presenting no statistically significant difference (p > .05).

Figure 3. – Inorganic filler content (%) measured by thermogravimetric analysis (n = 3). The materials are ranked in descending order based on their average values; standard deviations are added as horizontal whiskers for each histogram. Similar capital letters placed on the right side of the material names connect RCs presenting no statistically significant difference (p > .05).