Figures & data
Table 1. Brands and composition of restorative GICs tested (data provided by manufacturers).
Figure 1. FTIR-ATR spectral variation of different GICs obtained as a function of the reaction time: (A) at 20 s and (B) at 1800 s, the load spectrum of the first main component PC1 is shown below, which shows the region that most contributed to the spectral variation as a function of time. Respective PC1 X PC2 scores (C, D) are shown on the right side. The insert shows an example for the whole spectral change with time, between 1800 and 900 cm−1, for the EF cement.
![Figure 1. FTIR-ATR spectral variation of different GICs obtained as a function of the reaction time: (A) at 20 s and (B) at 1800 s, the load spectrum of the first main component PC1 is shown below, which shows the region that most contributed to the spectral variation as a function of time. Respective PC1 X PC2 scores (C, D) are shown on the right side. The insert shows an example for the whole spectral change with time, between 1800 and 900 cm−1, for the EF cement.](/cms/asset/5b70a640-f592-4166-8115-6c56c7e25401/iabo_a_1898964_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. (A) Curve representing the time evolution for the values of PC1 in the PCA analysis calculated from the FTIR-ATR. Each curve is an average of five independent measurements (n = 5). The exponential fitting with EquationEquation (1)(1) provided the stabilization time of chemical bonds (τ) of the GICS; (B) Comparison between the hardening times and the stabilization times.
![Figure 2. (A) Curve representing the time evolution for the values of PC1 in the PCA analysis calculated from the FTIR-ATR. Each curve is an average of five independent measurements (n = 5). The exponential fitting with EquationEquation (1)(1) provided the stabilization time of chemical bonds (τ) of the GICS; (B) Comparison between the hardening times and the stabilization times.](/cms/asset/cd22c33e-6b08-4945-aade-e1a5dc8cfaff/iabo_a_1898964_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. GICs temperature variation as a function of time. The inserts exemplify images obtained by the thermographic camera at specific instants of the reaction.
![Figure 3. GICs temperature variation as a function of time. The inserts exemplify images obtained by the thermographic camera at specific instants of the reaction.](/cms/asset/24470683-8d05-4577-9bbd-63dcea1c6155/iabo_a_1898964_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. (A) Comparison between the temperature variation of RV and the evolution of the bands as a function of time; (B) schematic illustration of possible sequences of the reaction. (I) First stage of the reaction, which is the acid hydrolysis on the glass particles surfaces; (II) second stage representing the ion release to the matrix.
![Figure 4. (A) Comparison between the temperature variation of RV and the evolution of the bands as a function of time; (B) schematic illustration of possible sequences of the reaction. (I) First stage of the reaction, which is the acid hydrolysis on the glass particles surfaces; (II) second stage representing the ion release to the matrix.](/cms/asset/d396d24b-8e28-4f93-a357-0e2d69eb6257/iabo_a_1898964_f0004_c.jpg)