Self-leadership: The power behind empowerment

Figures & data

Table 1. Correlation analysis.

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4
1. Autonomy	3.85	0.72	—
2. Development support	3.44	0.88	0.55*	—
3. Self-leadership	3.85	0.59	0.40*	0.37*	—
4. Goal achievement	3.76	0.64	0.35*	0.33*	0.45*	—

N = 1,118, *p < .001.

Table 2. Moderation analysis.

Variables	Dependent variable: Self-leadership
	Step 1	Step 2	Step 3
Step 1: Controls Tenure Age	−.033 (.045) −.024 (.025)	.036 (.041) .000 (.023)	−.043 (.040) −.006 (.022)
Step 2: Main effect
Autonomy		.315*** (.039)	.248*** (.040)
Autonomy × development support			.297** (.061)
R^2	.003	.123	.219
ΔR^2		.120***	.096***

N = 1118. **p < .01; ***p < .001.

Note. Variance inflation factor (VIF) statistics for all models: 1.014 < VIF < 1.382. Durbin Watson: 1.833.

Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported (standard errors in parentheses).