Figures & data
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the possible modes for matrix ellipsometer processes of MCD films.
![Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the possible modes for matrix ellipsometer processes of MCD films.](/cms/asset/e90052d8-cd01-4054-845a-82c895e3e8dd/tfdi_a_2330460_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Experimental and fitted values of φ and Δ values for samples with Un-implanted, As-implanted, B-MCD-700, B-MCD-800 and B-MCD-900, respectively.
![Figure 2. Experimental and fitted values of φ and Δ values for samples with Un-implanted, As-implanted, B-MCD-700, B-MCD-800 and B-MCD-900, respectively.](/cms/asset/d1a41489-5f24-4cba-95ba-dc478969d1ec/tfdi_a_2330460_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. The variation of index of refraction (n) and extinction coefficient (k) with incident wavelength and photo energy for samples (a) Un-implanted, (b) As-implanted, (c) B-MCD-700, (d) B-MCD-800 and (e) B-MCD-900, respectively. FESEM micrographs and corresponding AFM three-dimensional stereographs of samples (f-F) Un-implanted, (g-G) As-implanted, (h-H) B-MCD-700, (i-I) B-MCD-800 and (j-J) B-MCD-900, respectively.
![Figure 3. The variation of index of refraction (n) and extinction coefficient (k) with incident wavelength and photo energy for samples (a) Un-implanted, (b) As-implanted, (c) B-MCD-700, (d) B-MCD-800 and (e) B-MCD-900, respectively. FESEM micrographs and corresponding AFM three-dimensional stereographs of samples (f-F) Un-implanted, (g-G) As-implanted, (h-H) B-MCD-700, (i-I) B-MCD-800 and (j-J) B-MCD-900, respectively.](/cms/asset/86e933e8-c88a-49e3-8f09-1ea355ea7851/tfdi_a_2330460_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1. The values of thickness, roughness and EMA from SE test fitting information and the data of Ra and Rq obtained from AFM.