Figures & data
Figure 1. Schematic of computational domain with subregions RBC, plasma, vascular wall, interstitium and tissue.
![Figure 1. Schematic of computational domain with subregions RBC, plasma, vascular wall, interstitium and tissue.](/cms/asset/d80701ba-de6c-4d5a-a932-8f0a260c2ac1/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0001_b.gif)
Table 1. List of Model Parameters
Figure 2. Comparison of ko, for different initial PO2. P50,cHb=P50,sHb=29.3 Torr, nc=ns=2.2, [Hb]s=7g/dl, Hc=0.2.
![Figure 2. Comparison of ko, for different initial PO2. P50,cHb=P50,sHb=29.3 Torr, nc=ns=2.2, [Hb]s=7g/dl, Hc=0.2.](/cms/asset/6b8827f4-80cd-4666-94b0-eed44020bb02/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of HBOC oxygen affinities. P 50,cHb=29.3 Torr, nc=ns=2.2. Hc=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Comparison of kcell for different values of HBOC oxygen affinities. P50,cHb=29.3 Torr, nc=ns=2.2, Hc=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.
![Figure 3. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of HBOC oxygen affinities. P 50,cHb=29.3 Torr, nc=ns=2.2. Hc=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Comparison of kcell for different values of HBOC oxygen affinities. P50,cHb=29.3 Torr, nc=ns=2.2, Hc=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.](/cms/asset/715303b8-5e9c-4344-814e-eca5a460aa1c/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of HBOC oxygen cooperatives. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Comparison of k cell for different values of HBOC oxygen cooperatives. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.
![Figure 4. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of HBOC oxygen cooperatives. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Comparison of k cell for different values of HBOC oxygen cooperatives. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.](/cms/asset/2a3deeb3-ab94-45b3-bf1f-a613040c0e4b/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of HBOC concentrations. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2. (B) Comparison of k cell for different values of HBOC concentrations. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2.
![Figure 5. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of HBOC concentrations. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2. (B) Comparison of k cell for different values of HBOC concentrations. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2.](/cms/asset/f7069dcb-0a05-46ad-8c84-1676a3b64269/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0005_b.gif)
Figure 6. (A) Tissue PO 2 distribution along capillary length for different HBOC oxygen affinities. P 50,c Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Radial tissue PO 2 distribution profiles for different HBOC oxygen affinities. P 50,c Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. The vertical line shows the plasma-wall interface. A-arteriolar end, M-midcap, V-venular end. –·–·–·–· P 50,s Hb=10 Torr, ------- P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, ——— P 50,s Hb=50 Torr.
![Figure 6. (A) Tissue PO 2 distribution along capillary length for different HBOC oxygen affinities. P 50,c Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Radial tissue PO 2 distribution profiles for different HBOC oxygen affinities. P 50,c Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. The vertical line shows the plasma-wall interface. A-arteriolar end, M-midcap, V-venular end. –·–·–·–· P 50,s Hb=10 Torr, ------- P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, ——— P 50,s Hb=50 Torr.](/cms/asset/4c781fd9-4fcc-47e5-9ee5-a27ccfd73fe3/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0006_b.gif)
Figure 7. Tissue PO 2 distribution along capillary length for different HBOC oxygen cooperatives. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.
![Figure 7. Tissue PO 2 distribution along capillary length for different HBOC oxygen cooperatives. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=2.2, H c=0.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.](/cms/asset/66f39bb3-7f86-4247-bd8f-0c9378b55e35/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0007_b.gif)
Figure 8. Tissue PO 2 distribution along capillary length for different HBOC concentrations. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2.
![Figure 8. Tissue PO 2 distribution along capillary length for different HBOC concentrations. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, H c=0.2.](/cms/asset/07cd8da9-83d0-423e-a30c-e61a6fdb782f/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0008_b.gif)
Figure 9. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of hematocrits. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Comparison of k cell for different values of hematocrits. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.
![Figure 9. (A) Comparison of k o for different values of hematocrits. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl. (B) Comparison of k cell for different values of hematocrits. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.](/cms/asset/d3fa156a-9946-45c1-a0e2-17a3ffeacda8/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0009_b.gif)
Figure 10. Comparison of kinetic parameter values with and without HBOC. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.
![Figure 10. Comparison of kinetic parameter values with and without HBOC. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.](/cms/asset/198ea137-9f16-486f-8e96-f8c0362a08f4/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0010_b.gif)
Figure 11. Comparison of overall mass transfer coefficient for different HBOC diffusion coefficients. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.
![Figure 11. Comparison of overall mass transfer coefficient for different HBOC diffusion coefficients. P 50,c Hb=P 50,s Hb=29.3 Torr, n c=n s=2.2, [Hb] s=7 g/dl.](/cms/asset/56c7b240-bd72-4e47-b205-2deb97d55a6e/ianb19_a_11116809_uf0011_b.gif)