125
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

NEW APPROACH TO MODEL FITTING IN MULTI-DETECTOR GPC

Pages 2615-2639 | Received 12 Apr 2000, Accepted 04 May 2000, Published online: 16 Aug 2006
 

Abstract

The main limitation of multi-detector GPC arises from the nature of detector sensitivities in the tails of a polymer distribution. In the low molecular weight tail of this distribution, molecular weight-sensitive detectors (such as a capillary viscometer or a static laser light-scattering photometer) have low sensitivity while concentration detectors (e.g., differential refractometer) have high sensitivity. This situation is reversed in the high molecular weight tail.

These imbalances in sensitivity raise the question of how best to obtain an estimate of column calibration curves. The question is central to the successful application of the multi-detector GPC technique. For example, the accuracy and precision with which structural information for polymers with broad molecular weight distribution, especially with long-chain branches, can be obtained depends critically on the accurate estimation of such calibration curves in the tails.

Traditionally, calibration curves are fit to the logarithm of the ratios of detector responses. However, the logarithm of a ratio will not give meaningful values in the regions where at least one of the responses is near zero. Thus, low detector sensitivity in the tails requires that a calibration curve be fit only to the heart of the peak, where all detectors have good response. The optimized curve is then extrapolated to the regions in the tails that were excluded from the fit.

This data truncation has two consequences that limit the accuracy and precision of the multi-detector GPC technique. Truncation eliminates potentially useful responses with which to constrain the calibration curves, and the resulting curves can be sensitive to the choice of the fitting region.

We describe a new data analysis method for multi-detector GPC where the complete chromatographic profile obtained from one detector is compared, in a least-squares sense, to a model that is a function of responses from the other detector. This formulation of least-squares avoids the use of logarithms, ratios, and eliminates the need for extrapolation. The approach allows the inclusion of regions in the least-squares fit that contain low detector's signal, e.g., near baseline responses that fluctuate about zero from either, or both, detectors.

We apply this approach to obtain column calibration curves with each of two molecular weight-sensitive detectors, coupled to a GPC system. Such calibration curves are the necessary intermediate steps in determining the polymer's molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity distributions. If suitable calibration standards are available, we further show how the polymer's intrinsic viscosity law can be obtained directly from dual-detector responses without requiring - or depending on - a sample-dependent calibration curve.

Acknowledgments

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 583.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.