5,142
Views
129
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus on Nanomaterials and Nanofabrication for Biomedical Applications

A microfluidic paper-based electrochemical biosensor array for multiplexed detection of metabolic biomarkers

, &
Article: 054402 | Received 18 Jul 2013, Accepted 26 Sep 2013, Published online: 18 Oct 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. A microfluidic paper-based electrochemical biosensor array that interfaces with a custom-made handheld potentiostat for multiplexed detection of metabolic biomarkers. (A) A paper-based electrochemical biosensor array (1 × 8). (B) A microcontroller-based multiplexing potentiostat mounted with a paper-based biosensor array. The potentiostat has eight measurement channels, and each channel is connected to a group of three sensing electrodes through metal clamps. CE: counter electrode. WE: working electrode. RE: reference electrode. (C) Schematic diagram of the potentiostat architecture with eight measurement channels. (D) A photograph of the paper-based biosensor array inserted into the potentiostat.

Figure 1. A microfluidic paper-based electrochemical biosensor array that interfaces with a custom-made handheld potentiostat for multiplexed detection of metabolic biomarkers. (A) A paper-based electrochemical biosensor array (1 × 8). (B) A microcontroller-based multiplexing potentiostat mounted with a paper-based biosensor array. The potentiostat has eight measurement channels, and each channel is connected to a group of three sensing electrodes through metal clamps. CE: counter electrode. WE: working electrode. RE: reference electrode. (C) Schematic diagram of the potentiostat architecture with eight measurement channels. (D) A photograph of the paper-based biosensor array inserted into the potentiostat.

Figure 2. Electrochemical characterization of the paper-based biosensor array. (A) Typical cyclic voltammograms of 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] in 1 M KCl solution in an electrochemical biosensing module of the array device at various scan rates. (B) A plot of the cathodic peak current ipc versus the square root of the scan rate ν1/2, measured from the cyclic voltammograms (n = 5).

Figure 2. Electrochemical characterization of the paper-based biosensor array. (A) Typical cyclic voltammograms of 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] in 1 M KCl solution in an electrochemical biosensing module of the array device at various scan rates. (B) A plot of the cathodic peak current ipc versus the square root of the scan rate ν1/2, measured from the cyclic voltammograms (n = 5).

Figure 3. (A) Chronoamperometric curves and (B) the calibration plot for measurement of glucose in AU. The solid line in (B) represents a linear fit to experimental data with regression equation: y = 0.041x + 0.054 (R2 = 0.996, n = 5).

Figure 3. (A) Chronoamperometric curves and (B) the calibration plot for measurement of glucose in AU. The solid line in (B) represents a linear fit to experimental data with regression equation: y = 0.041x + 0.054 (R2 = 0.996, n = 5).

Figure 4. (A) Chronoamperometric curves and (B) the calibration plot for measurement of lactate in AU. The solid line in (B) represents a linear fit to experimental data with regression equation: y = 0.0076x + 0.025 (R2 = 0.995, n = 5).

Figure 4. (A) Chronoamperometric curves and (B) the calibration plot for measurement of lactate in AU. The solid line in (B) represents a linear fit to experimental data with regression equation: y = 0.0076x + 0.025 (R2 = 0.995, n = 5).

Figure 5. (A) Chronoamperometric curves and (B) the calibration plot for measurement of uric acid in AU. The solid line represents a linear fit to experimental data with regression equation: y = 0.048x + 0.029 (R2 = 0.994, n = 5).

Figure 5. (A) Chronoamperometric curves and (B) the calibration plot for measurement of uric acid in AU. The solid line represents a linear fit to experimental data with regression equation: y = 0.048x + 0.029 (R2 = 0.994, n = 5).

Table 1. Performance comparison of the paper-based biosensor array with commercial meters [Citation20] and μPAD in [Citation14].