57
Views
72
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Papers

Pentacam posterior and anterior corneal aberrations in normal and keratoconic eyes

, PhD, , MD PhD, , OD, , MD & , MD
Pages 297-303 | Received 23 Oct 2008, Accepted 15 Jan 2009, Published online: 15 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose:  The aim was to evaluate the anterior and posterior corneal aberrations provided by the Pentacam system in normal and early to moderate keratoconic eyes.

Methods:  Fifteen normal eyes (normal group, mean age 32.60 ± 7.45-years) and 15 eyes with the diagnosis of keratoconus (keratoconus group, mean age 29.07 ± 8.66-years) were included in this study. All eyes received a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including corneal topographic analysis with the Pentacam system. Keratometric, best‐fit sphere and corneal aberrometric data were recorded and analysed. Root mean square values (RMS) were calculated for primary coma and coma‐like aberrations.

Results:  Statistically significant differences were found in all anterior aberrometric parameters (all p < 0.02), except for horizontal primary and secondary coma Zernike terms (p = 0.61 and 0.72). Regarding posterior corneal surface, statistically significant differences among groups were found in primary spherical aberration, primary vertical coma, coma RMS and coma‐like RMS (all p < 0.01). In the normal group significantly higher levels of primary vertical coma, spherical aberration, coma and coma‐like RMS were found for the posterior corneal surface (all p < 0.04). In the keratoconus group, only significant differences among anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were found in coma RMS, coma‐like RMS and vertical coma (all p < 0.01). These higher levels of aberrations for the posterior corneal surface do not agree with the theoretical optical properties of this surface.

Conclusions:  With the Pentacam system, higher levels of vertical coma, primary coma and coma‐like aberrations are present in keratoconic eyes compared to normal eyes. The values provided by this device for posterior corneal aberrations are erroneous.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in the medical devices that are involved in this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Purchase Issue

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 84.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.