Trapped or on the Springboard? Housing Careers in Large Housing Estates in European Cities

ABSTRACT:

In the first three decades after the Second World War in Europe millions of dwellings were built, in most cases on large estates in or near cities. At that time, many people in various kinds of household found these estates attractive and were happy to live on them. But, in the last two decades, in many parts of Europe social, economic, and physical problems have emerged and the reputation of the estates has suffered a deep decline. That is not to say that they have lost their function in the housing market: some groups might still be drawn to them—low-income households who cannot find a decent, affordable place elsewhere, for example. In this article, we describe the current position of these estates in the housing careers of specific groups. Are there some groups who find them attractive places in which to live? Or do most people want to get away as soon as they can? Are some people “trapped”? We show that the situation differs substantially between parts of Europe, but even per estate and per household category. Our findings imply that intervention strategies with regard to these estates will have to become much more differentiated than they currently are.

Notes

1 See http://www.restate.geo.uu.nl for information about this project. Reports that were produced within this project can be downloaded from this site.

2 In Table 6 it is shown that there are differences in terms of significance. Although these differences are not irrelevant, we should not forget that the significant difference is only measured relative to the reference category; levels of significance change if another reference category is chosen. We have not therefore paid too much attention to these significances.