499
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short paper

Promotion of host plant growth and infection of roots with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita by the application of peat

, &
Pages 162-167 | Received 29 Jul 2005, Accepted 02 Dec 2005, Published online: 17 Dec 2010

Figures & data

Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of the soil medium

Figure 1  Shoot fresh weight of (a) non-inoculated plants and (b) inoculated plants at each harvest time. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 1  Shoot fresh weight of (a) non-inoculated plants and (b) inoculated plants at each harvest time. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 2  Total root length of inoculated plants. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. Differences among the levels of peat addition were determined using an anova (P = 0.58, 0.04, 0.036 and 0.16 at 40, 60, 90 and 120 days, respectively). Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 2  Total root length of inoculated plants. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. Differences among the levels of peat addition were determined using an anova (P = 0.58, 0.04, 0.036 and 0.16 at 40, 60, 90 and 120 days, respectively). Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 3  Root colonization at each harvest time. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. Differences among the levels of peat addition were determined using an anova (P = 0.03, 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001 at 40, 60, 90 and 120 days, respectively). Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 3  Root colonization at each harvest time. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. Differences among the levels of peat addition were determined using an anova (P = 0.03, 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001 at 40, 60, 90 and 120 days, respectively). Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 4  Spore number per pot at each harvest time. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. The differences among the levels of peat addition were determined using an anova (P = 0.01, 0.001, 0.04 and 0.001 at 40, 60, 90 and 120 days, respectively). Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Figure 4  Spore number per pot at each harvest time. Bars represent standard deviations of the means of three replicates. The differences among the levels of peat addition were determined using an anova (P = 0.01, 0.001, 0.04 and 0.001 at 40, 60, 90 and 120 days, respectively). Peat addition rate: 0% (–⧫–), 2.5% (–▪–), 5% (–▴–), 10% (--×--), 15% (–×–) and 20% (–•–) (w/w).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.