Figures & data
Figure 1 Spectral photon flux density (PFD) distributions for the lighting treatments. Blue-light PFDs were (a) 0, (b) 30, (c) 100 and (d) 150 µmol m−2 s−1. Total photosynthetic photon flux density was 300 µmol m−2 s−1 in any lighting treatment. The PFD was measured every 0.4–0.5 nm.
![Figure 1 Spectral photon flux density (PFD) distributions for the lighting treatments. Blue-light PFDs were (a) 0, (b) 30, (c) 100 and (d) 150 µmol m−2 s−1. Total photosynthetic photon flux density was 300 µmol m−2 s−1 in any lighting treatment. The PFD was measured every 0.4–0.5 nm.](/cms/asset/e6afcad4-c8ea-4035-b2f5-16f81d3d9eef/tssp_a_10382513_o_f0001g.gif)
Figure 2 The relationship between (a) the light-saturated rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area (LA) and (b) leaf N content per unit LA as functions of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Gas-exchange measurements were made at a photosynthetic photon flux density of 1,800 µmol m−2 s−1, an ambient CO2 partial pressure of 36 Pa, a leaf temperature of 25°C and a leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit of 1.1 ± 0.1 kPa. Light for measurements was provided from a white halogen lamp. Error bars represent standard error (n ≥ 4). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).
![Figure 2 The relationship between (a) the light-saturated rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area (LA) and (b) leaf N content per unit LA as functions of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Gas-exchange measurements were made at a photosynthetic photon flux density of 1,800 µmol m−2 s−1, an ambient CO2 partial pressure of 36 Pa, a leaf temperature of 25°C and a leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit of 1.1 ± 0.1 kPa. Light for measurements was provided from a white halogen lamp. Error bars represent standard error (n ≥ 4). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).](/cms/asset/87680f61-ff7f-40f8-9cd2-16d2f9f917f3/tssp_a_10382513_o_f0002g.gif)
Figure 3 The relationship between (a) leaf dry weight (DW) per unit leaf area (LA) and (b) leaf N content per unit DW as functions of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Error bars represent standard error (n ≥ 6). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).
![Figure 3 The relationship between (a) leaf dry weight (DW) per unit leaf area (LA) and (b) leaf N content per unit DW as functions of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Error bars represent standard error (n ≥ 6). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).](/cms/asset/911068ae-579d-4902-a0e5-ec95423cd652/tssp_a_10382513_o_f0003g.gif)
Figure 4 The relationships between (a) cytochrome (Cyt) f, (b) light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding protein of photosystem II (LHCII) and (c) chlorophyll (Chl) content per unit leaf area (LA) and (d) Chl a/b ratio as functions of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Error bars represent standard error (n ≥ 3). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).
![Figure 4 The relationships between (a) cytochrome (Cyt) f, (b) light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding protein of photosystem II (LHCII) and (c) chlorophyll (Chl) content per unit leaf area (LA) and (d) Chl a/b ratio as functions of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Error bars represent standard error (n ≥ 3). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).](/cms/asset/9117f236-d00e-49ba-88a8-ff8b34c51f4b/tssp_a_10382513_o_f0004g.gif)
Figure 5 The relationship between the ratio of cytochrome (Cyt) f content to light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding protein of photosystem II (LHCII) content as a function of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Eror bars represent standard error (n = 3). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).
![Figure 5 The relationship between the ratio of cytochrome (Cyt) f content to light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding protein of photosystem II (LHCII) content as a function of blue-light photon flux density in spinach leaves. Eror bars represent standard error (n = 3). Means with different letters are significantly different using Tukey's honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05).](/cms/asset/19fc5902-1777-4659-a528-774d2ac38098/tssp_a_10382513_o_f0005g.gif)