3,991
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of different types of organic fertilizers on the chemical properties and enzymatic activities of an Oxisol under intensive cultivation of vegetables for 4 years

, &
Pages 587-599 | Received 03 Sep 2007, Accepted 23 Jan 2008, Published online: 21 Dec 2010

Figures & data

Table 1 Some selected chemical properties of the original soil and the soils after harvesting the final three crops

Table 2 Some selected heavy metal contents of the original soil and the soil after harvesting the final three crops

Table 3 Some selected characteristics (on a dry-weight basis) of the organic fertilizers used in the experiment

Figure 1  Effect of the treatments on the microbial biomass content, respiration and nitrification over 4 years of cultivation. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.95 level of probability, according to a Duncan's Multiple Range Test. CDC, chicken dung compost; CF, chemical fertilizer; DCDC, dairy cattle dung compost; HDC, hog dung compost; PRC, pea residue compost; SA, sequential application; SBM, soybean meal.

Figure 1  Effect of the treatments on the microbial biomass content, respiration and nitrification over 4 years of cultivation. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.95 level of probability, according to a Duncan's Multiple Range Test. CDC, chicken dung compost; CF, chemical fertilizer; DCDC, dairy cattle dung compost; HDC, hog dung compost; PRC, pea residue compost; SA, sequential application; SBM, soybean meal.

Table 4 Linear correlation coefficients between selected chemical properties and the enzymatic activities of the soils

Figure 2  Effect of the treatments on soil enzymatic activities over 4 years of cultivation. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.95 level of probability, according to a Duncan's Multiple Range Test. CDC, chicken dung compost; CF, chemical fertilizer; DCDC, dairy cattle dung compost; HDC, hog dung compost; PRC, pea residue compost; SA, sequential application; SBM, soybean meal.

Figure 2  Effect of the treatments on soil enzymatic activities over 4 years of cultivation. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.95 level of probability, according to a Duncan's Multiple Range Test. CDC, chicken dung compost; CF, chemical fertilizer; DCDC, dairy cattle dung compost; HDC, hog dung compost; PRC, pea residue compost; SA, sequential application; SBM, soybean meal.

Table 5 Linear correlation coefficients between the extractable heavy metal concentrations and the enzymatic activities of the soils

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.