Searching for Personal Territory in a Human-Computer Interaction Design Studio

Figures & data

Figure 1 Cycles of expression and feedback (from Shaffer, 2007)

Figure 2a Two consecutive observation instrument pages (3.40pm on the same day)

Figure 2b Observations at 4.00pm on the same day

Table 1 Number and classification of interviewees

Interviewee Classification	Number
Faculty	2
First-year Masters Students	1
Second-year Masters Students	2

Table 2 Data codes* pertaining to research questions and used in analysis

Design	Epistemology
	Pedagogy
Behaviour	Identity Marking
	Control Marking
	Anticipatory Defensive
	Reactionary Defensive
Features	Provided
	Missing
	Satisfied elsewhere

* Derived from Cennamo et al. (2010) and Brown (2009)

Shaffer D. W. (2007). Learning in design. In: Lesh R. A., Kaput J. J. & Hamilton E. (Eds.). Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 99-126. URL: http://epistemicgames.org/cv/papers/8089_Lesh_CH05.pdf

 Google Scholar

Cennamo K. C., Brandt C., Douglas S., Vernon M. & McGrath M. (2010). A theoretical overview of the studio as a learning environment. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference. Denver, CO, April 2010.

 Google Scholar

Brown G. (2009). Claiming a corner at work: Measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29 (1), 44-52.

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar