Figures & data
Figure 2. Effects of myricetin on TBARS formation in various systems and variants of the deoxyribose degradation assay; 100% TBARS represents mean formation in the FeCl3 or FeEDTA variant of the classical ascorbic acid–H2O2 system; bars are mean ± SD; N = 3, letters indicate different levels of significance between effects (95% Duncan's multiple range test).
![Figure 2. Effects of myricetin on TBARS formation in various systems and variants of the deoxyribose degradation assay; 100% TBARS represents mean formation in the FeCl3 or FeEDTA variant of the classical ascorbic acid–H2O2 system; bars are mean ± SD; N = 3, letters indicate different levels of significance between effects (95% Duncan's multiple range test).](/cms/asset/7bcfda08-16bc-4738-acbd-a002471679d2/yrer_a_11661915_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Dose–response curves of TBARS formation depending on the myricetin:Fe ratio in various systems and variants of the deoxyribose degradation assay; 100% TBARS represents mean formation in the FeCl3 or FeEDTA variant of the classical ascorbic acid–H2O2 system; X-axis has logarithmic scaling but values are not transformed.
![Figure 3. Dose–response curves of TBARS formation depending on the myricetin:Fe ratio in various systems and variants of the deoxyribose degradation assay; 100% TBARS represents mean formation in the FeCl3 or FeEDTA variant of the classical ascorbic acid–H2O2 system; X-axis has logarithmic scaling but values are not transformed.](/cms/asset/85f911f3-f23c-4d08-88e8-2b60b37b43a9/yrer_a_11661915_f0003_b.jpg)