Figures & data
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients in four RCTs
Figure 2. Relative risk of viral load in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.
![Figure 2. Relative risk of viral load in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.](/cms/asset/e317581d-e27a-49e8-b8af-84067faa66d7/yhct_a_11737050_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Relative risk of virological failure in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.
![Figure 3. Relative risk of virological failure in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.](/cms/asset/427cc130-664b-4c1d-b424-7ee36b1057fd/yhct_a_11737050_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Relative risk of rash events in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.
![Figure 4. Relative risk of rash events in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.](/cms/asset/d4f3ac80-db96-4d96-98ed-3ba0a482d305/yhct_a_11737050_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Relative risk of neurological events in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.
![Figure 5. Relative risk of neurological events in patients exposed to RPV (left) versus EFV (right) at week 48.](/cms/asset/e4201822-a741-4390-819b-33c808e47eea/yhct_a_11737050_f0005_b.jpg)