Figures & data
Figure 1. MACS separated and expanded CD133+ cells detection by flow cytometry. The upper row shows isotype-negative control, the lower row shows CD133- and CD34-positive cells percent. R1 = 98.6%, RN1 = 71.2% = CD34+ cells and RN2 = 94.1% = CD133+ cells.
![Figure 1. MACS separated and expanded CD133+ cells detection by flow cytometry. The upper row shows isotype-negative control, the lower row shows CD133- and CD34-positive cells percent. R1 = 98.6%, RN1 = 71.2% = CD34+ cells and RN2 = 94.1% = CD133+ cells.](/cms/asset/bd1ff113-174d-4b35-926a-1ca9e5bd1b6f/yhem_a_11732873_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. (A) Immunoflourescent microscopic picture of LNA FITC-Scr CD133 +-treated cells. (B) Light microscopic picture of the same cells (Leica, Weltzar, Germany ×100). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of LNA FITC-ScrCD133 +-treated cells, R1 = 97.1%, RN1 = 43.2%.
![Figure 2. (A) Immunoflourescent microscopic picture of LNA FITC-Scr CD133 +-treated cells. (B) Light microscopic picture of the same cells (Leica, Weltzar, Germany ×100). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of LNA FITC-ScrCD133 +-treated cells, R1 = 97.1%, RN1 = 43.2%.](/cms/asset/c74f86f9-4772-4eb6-a6f6-c3b0fd9cc748/yhem_a_11732873_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1. The transfected CD133+ cells percentage in different concentration of LNA FITC-scramble
Figure 3. The Mk differentiation of CD133+ Hematopoietic stem cells in different treatments. (A) The mean percentage of CD42/CD61- and CD41-positive cells in days of treatment. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of Mk differentiation detection, the upper row shows TPO-treated cells, R1 = 91.9%, CD42/CD61+ cells = 80.9%, CD41+ cells = 86.8%, the lower row shows anti-miR-10a-treated cells, R1 = 93.28%, CD42/CD61+ = 36.3%, CD41+ cells = 30.1%.
![Figure 3. The Mk differentiation of CD133+ Hematopoietic stem cells in different treatments. (A) The mean percentage of CD42/CD61- and CD41-positive cells in days of treatment. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of Mk differentiation detection, the upper row shows TPO-treated cells, R1 = 91.9%, CD42/CD61+ cells = 80.9%, CD41+ cells = 86.8%, the lower row shows anti-miR-10a-treated cells, R1 = 93.28%, CD42/CD61+ = 36.3%, CD41+ cells = 30.1%.](/cms/asset/24be206e-a6e1-4cb6-8e61-b7ad8548bbc4/yhem_a_11732873_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR. (A) Fold expansion of HOX A1 mRNA in different treatments with respect to CD133+ untreated cells. (B) Fold difference of miR-10a in different treatments with respect to CD133+ untreated cells.
![Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR. (A) Fold expansion of HOX A1 mRNA in different treatments with respect to CD133+ untreated cells. (B) Fold difference of miR-10a in different treatments with respect to CD133+ untreated cells.](/cms/asset/8dcffb5d-d7de-4d25-ad2a-97008c4384e1/yhem_a_11732873_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Comparison of MFI in the different treated cells that react by FITC-conjugated Hox A1 MoAb. (A) Flow cytometric analysis overlaid histograms. (B) MFI of reacted cells in no treatment CD133+ cells = 11.2 ± 4.6, anti-miR-10a-treated cells = 40.2 ± 15.4, TPO-treated cells = 190.0 ± 42.1, and in HEK cells as a cell line that expresses the most miR-10a level = 8.2 ± 6.2.
![Figure 5. Comparison of MFI in the different treated cells that react by FITC-conjugated Hox A1 MoAb. (A) Flow cytometric analysis overlaid histograms. (B) MFI of reacted cells in no treatment CD133+ cells = 11.2 ± 4.6, anti-miR-10a-treated cells = 40.2 ± 15.4, TPO-treated cells = 190.0 ± 42.1, and in HEK cells as a cell line that expresses the most miR-10a level = 8.2 ± 6.2.](/cms/asset/984471c4-fe05-4115-a945-99417319fe91/yhem_a_11732873_f0005_b.jpg)