658
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Surgery

Effect of different depths of anesthesia on postoperative cognitive function in laparoscopic patients: a randomized clinical trial

, &
Pages 1883-1887 | Accepted 21 Jul 2015, Published online: 23 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

Objective:

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is caused by many factors. This work was conducted to investigate the effect of different depths of anesthesia during combined intravenous–inhalational anesthesia on postoperative cognitive function in young and middle-aged laparoscopic patients.

Methods:

A total of 192 patients scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic operations were randomly divided into three groups. Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of sevoflurane and infusion of remifentanil, which was adjusted to maintain bispectral index (BIS) at 30 < BIS ≤ 40 in Group I, 40 < BIS ≤ 50 in Group II and 50 < BIS ≤ 60 in Group III. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Trail-Making Test (TMT) were used to assess cognitive function on the day before anesthesia and the day after surgery.

Results:

There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, educational level and surgery time. On the day before anesthesia, the average MMSE scores and TMT completion times in the three groups were not significantly different. On the day after surgery, Group II had a significantly higher average MMSE score (29.00 ± 0.89) than Group I (28.36 ± 1.42, p = 0.010) and Group III (28.45 ± 1.27, p = 0.035) and lower TMT completion time (33.68 ± 10.34) than Group I (39.45 ± 13.99, p = 0.027) and Group III (39.50 ± 12.50, p = 0.026).

Conclusion:

These results indicated that the depth of anesthesia, 40 < BIS ≤ 50, under combined intravenous–inhalational anesthesia yielded milder influence on postoperative cognitive function in young and middle-aged laparoscopic patients.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The authors declare no funding for this manuscript.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

A.-H.S., Q.W., and X.-B.C. have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with or financial interests in any commercial companies related to this study or article.

CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

None reported.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.